Momentum on gender, a standstill on nationality

Women held 33.6% of board seats on 1 January and 34.9% by 30 June — a 1.3-point gain in six months, on top of the longer climb from 28.2% in 2022. Most of that climb happened in 2025, when the share jumped 3.0 points — the largest annual move in the series, and a full year before the compliance deadline. Boards with only one woman fell from 26.2% to 21.9% of the market, while boards above the 40% mark rose from 24.0% to 27.8%. Representation is broadening beyond a single seat. Yet the count of all-male boards held flat at eight companies, all of them Small Cap or First North, and the share of women serving as chair slipped from 12.0% (22 companies) to 10.7% (20 companies) — progress in membership has not yet reached the top of the table.

Nationality diversity did not move: Finnish nationals held 77.3% of seats at both the start and end of the period. The figure has sat between 77.3% and 78.2% in every reading since 2022, and the only real move was a 0.9-point fall in the Finnish share during 2025. Internationalisation stays concentrated in a handful of large, global companies and in telecommunications, health care and energy, while industrials, technology and consumer staples remain overwhelmingly domestic. Average board age eased from 57.6 to 57.0 over the half, though boards are older than they were: the average has climbed from 55.7 in 2022, and millennial representation ticked up from 12.0% to 12.2% — renewal at the margin, not in structure.

Highlights
  • Women reached 34.9% of board seats by 30 June, up from 33.6% on 1 January — a 1.3-point H1 gain
  • Women's share rose fastest in 2025 (+3.0 points), a year before the deadline; H1 2026 added 1.3
  • Boards above 40% women rose to 27.8% of the market; single-woman boards fell to 21.9%
  • Eight companies still report fully male boards; the female-chair share slipped to 10.7%
  • Finnish nationals held 77.3% of seats at both the start and close of the half — and between 77.3% and 78.2% in every reading since 2022
  • Average board age eased to 57.0 but is up from 55.7 in 2022, and 47.1% of boards still have no millennial director
  • Large Cap leads on both gender and nationality (42.0% women, 58.4% Finnish); First North is the most homogeneous segment (27.5% women, 86.1% Finnish)
  • Large Cap is used throughout as an approximation of the companies within the directive's scope; the legal test is employee- and size-based, not segment-based
34.9%
of board seats are held by women
77.3%
of directors are Finnish
57.0
years is the average director age (up from 55.7 in 2022)
12.2%
of directors are millennials

From a single seat toward balance

The half shows continued momentum rather than a plateau, with the character of change shifting from "adding a first woman" toward "moving past a single seat." Women rose from 33.6% to 34.9% of all board seats, and the share of boards above 40% women climbed from 24.0% to 27.8%. The pace, however, has slowed: the 3.0-point gain in 2025 was more than double the 1.3 points added in H1 2026. The persistence of eight all-male boards and the dip in female chairs mark where progress has not reached: the smallest companies, and the most senior board role.

Women on boards
% of seats · 2022–2026 H1
Share of womenCompanies with 0 women (%)
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%28.2%30.4%30.6%33.6%34.9%7.5%6.5%6.6%4.4%4.3%2022 End2023 End2024 End2025 End / 2026Start2026 H1 End
Source: Listeds Executive Platform
Figure 1 — Women on boards and companies with zero women, 2022–2026 H1.

Boards with only one woman fell from 26.2% to 21.9% of companies; boards above 40% women rose from 24.0% to 27.8%. All-male boards held flat at eight companies (4.4% to 4.3% of the market). Female chairs slipped from 12.0% (22 companies) to 10.7% (20 companies).

Board gender distribution
% of companies
0 women1 woman2+ women (≤40%)>40% women
1 Jan 202626.2%45.4%24.0%30 Jun 202621.9%46.0%27.8%
Source: Listeds Executive Platform
Figure 2 — Distribution of boards by gender composition, 1 January vs 30 June 2026.
Female board chairs
% of companies
5.0%7.5%10.0%12.5%15.0%7.5%9.7%11.9%12.0%10.7%2022 End2023 End2024 End2025 End / 2026Start2026 H1 End
Source: Listeds Executive Platform
Figure 3 — Female board chairs, 2022–2026 H1.

Still stalled

Finnish nationals accounted for 77.3% of seats at both start and end of the period — no meaningful change. The figure has held between 77.3% and 78.2% in every reading since 2022; the only real move came in 2025, when the Finnish share fell from 78.2% to 77.3%. The most international industries are telecommunications (44.1% Finnish), health care (61.9%), and energy (62.5%) among market segments, Large Cap is the most international (58.4%). The most domestic industries are consumer staples (88.0%) and industrials (85.3%); among segments, Small Cap (87.8%) and First North (86.1%). Despite the continued global expansion of Finnish issuers, board internationalisation has not followed, and new listings still tend to arrive with fully domestic boards.

Board nationality
% of seats
FinnishForeign
2022 End77.7%22.3%2023 End77.6%22.4%2024 End78.2%21.8%2025 End / 2026 Start77.3%22.7%2026 H1 End77.3%22.7%
Source: Listeds Executive Platform
Figure 4 — Board nationality mix, Finnish versus foreign directors, 2022–2026 H1.
“Finnish listed companies are internationalising their business faster than their boards. If a company's growth comes from outside its home market, the board should include at least one director who has relevant business experience from that market. Today's digital board meeting systems make high-quality, frictionless board work possible across borders as well.”
Henrikki Hirvonen
Henrikki HirvonenCountry Manager Finland, Admincontrol

Older over four years, marginally younger this half

Average board age eased from 57.6 to 57.0 over the half, and millennials (born 1980–1999) rose from 12.0% to 12.2% of seats. Over the full series, however, boards have aged by 1.3 years — from 55.7 at the end of 2022. Directors under 50 rose from 18.1% to 18.5%. Companies with no millennial director fell from 50.3% to 47.1% — still nearly half. Boardrooms remain anchored around directors in their late fifties.

Average board age
years
54.055.056.057.058.055.756.156.557.657.02022 End2023 End2024 End2026 Start2026 H1 End
Source: Listeds Executive Platform
Figure 5 — Average board age, 2022–2026 H1 (annual year-end snapshots; 2026 split into 1 Jan and 30 Jun to show the within-half move).
“Diversity is measured by gender, nationality and age because those are measurable. A board's real capability, however, is a question of expertise: does the board's expertise match the tactics and the strategy the company intends to execute over the coming years. Composition is only the starting point. Diverse board work is not automatically effective, because different perspectives produce better decisions only if the way the board works lets them reach the table.”
Henrikki Hirvonen
Henrikki HirvonenCountry Manager Finland, Admincontrol

Large Cap leads, First North lags

Large Cap companies continue to lead on gender and nationality, reaching 42.0% women by 30 June against 58.4% Finnish — the most balanced and most international segment. Small Cap posted the largest H1 gender gain of any segment (29.6% → 32.4%) and has the highest share of Finnish board members (87.8%), while First North remains the most homogeneous segment — the lowest share of women (27.5%) alongside the second-highest Finnish share (86.1%). By industry, consumer staples and technology posted the sharpest gender gains (36.1% → 40.0% and 29.5% → 32.9% respectively), and real estate remains the least gender-diverse at 25.0% women.

Diversity by segment
% · 30 June 2026
WomenForeign
First North (n = 244)27.5%13.9%Small Cap (n = 312)32.4%12.2%Mid Cap (n = 338)37.3%24.0%Large Cap (n = 262)42.0%41.6%
Source: Listeds Executive Platform
Figure 6 — Women and foreign directors by market segment, 30 June 2026. n = total number of directors in the segment.
Industry patterns
  • Consumer staples and technology posted the sharpest gender gain (36.1% → 40.0% women and 29.5% → 32.9% respectively)
  • Consumer staples and basic materials both reached about 40.0% women
  • Telecommunications is the most international (44.1% Finnish); health care (61.9%) and energy (62.5%) follow
  • Real estate remains the least gender-diverse (25.0% women)

Gender — leaders and all-male boards, 30 June 2026

The ten highest of sixteen companies at or above 50% female representation, spanning large caps and small caps alike.

Company

Women (%)

Board size

Suominen

66.7%

6

Aktia Bank

57.1%

7

Verkkokauppa.com

57.1%

7

Huhtamäki

55.6%

9

Fiskars

50.0%

8

Kempower

50.0%

8

Orion

50.0%

8

Stora Enso

50.0%

8

Administer

50.0%

6

Modulight

50.0%

4

Eight companies still reported all-male boards. All of those are either First North or small cap companies.

Company

Women (%)

Board size

Digitalist Group

0%

5

Dovre Group

0%

3

Eagle Filters Group

0%

5

Norrhydro Group

0%

5

Pallas Air

0%

4

Summa Defence

0%

6

Sunborn International

0%

4

Titanium

0%

5

Nationality, age and generational outliers

Companies with the lowest share of Finnish directors are not all the same case. Telia and Tallink Grupp are foreign-domiciled, where a fully non-Finnish board follows from where the company sits. Citycon is the more instructive one: a Finnish-domiciled Oyj that lost its last Finnish director inside this half, when its April AGM cut the board from ten seats to eight. Three of the eight remaining directors are tied to G City, the Israeli controlling shareholder. The board is not internationalising — it is consolidating around its owner.

Company

Finnish (%)

Board size

Telia Company

0%

9

Citycon

0%

8

Tallink Grupp

0%

6

Afarak Group

0%

3

Musti Group

16.7%

6

Nordea Bank

20.0%

10

Tecnotree

20.0%

5

Revenio Group

25.0%

8

Telia Company and Tallink Grupp are foreign-domiciled companies with secondary listings, included because the dataset covers Nasdaq Helsinki and First North Growth Market Finland listings regardless of country of domicile.

Even the youngest boards cluster at or above 45 — Talenom, at 40.8, is the only exception, underlining how rare a truly young board remains in the Finnish market.

Company

Avg birth year

Avg age (2026)

Talenom

1985.2

40.8

Easor

1981.0

45.0

Nokian Panimo

1980.7

45.3

Saga Furs

1978.6

47.4

Trainers' House

1978.4

47.6

Rebl Group

1976.9

49.1

Wulff-Yhtiöt

1976.8

49.2

Siili Solutions

1976.2

49.8

Etteplan

1976.0

50.0

SSH Communications Security

1976.0

50.0

Inderes

1975.8

50.2

LeadDesk

1975.8

50.2

Highest millennial representation

Company

Millennial (%)

Millennial Directors

Talenom

80.0%

4

Nokian Panimo

66.7%

4

Saga Furs

62.5%

5

Lemonsoft

50.0%

3

Easor

50.0%

2

What the next reading will test

The gains ran ahead of what the rule required. Women hold 34.9% of board seats across the market and 42.0% in Large Cap, but the lowest shares sit in small caps and on First North — the segments largely outside the directive's size thresholds.

The open question is whether it continues without a deadline attached to it. Three things to watch: whether the eight all-male boards change at the 2027 AGMs, whether the female-chair share recovers the two chair positions it lost, and whether nationality moves at all after four years of essentially flat readings.

Risks 2026–2028

  • A falling female-chair share suggests the pipeline into board leadership, not only membership, needs attention

  • Persistently domestic boards may weigh on international competitiveness

  • A director base still anchored in its late fifties poses succession questions

  • Most of the four-year gender gain landed in 2025, before the deadline; the H1 2026 pace was roughly half that. Whether the trend survives the deadline is the question the next reading answers

Opportunities 2026–2028

  • The 34.9% market average masks a working model: Large Cap already sits at 42.0%, so the pipeline exists — it has not reached the smaller segments

  • The most international boards sit in the most international industries — telecommunications at 44.1% Finnish, Large Cap segment at 58.4%. Board composition follows the business

At a glance

Metric

1 Jan 2026

30 Jun 2026

Women on boards

33.6%

34.9%

Boards with 0 women

4.4% (8 firms)

4.3% (8 firms)

Boards with 1 woman only

26.2%

21.9%

Boards above 40% women

24.0%

27.8%

Female board chairs

12.0%

10.7%

Finnish directors

77.3%

77.3%

Average board age

57.6

57.0

Millennial directors

12.0%

12.2%

Boards with no millennial

50.3%

47.1%

Women, Large Cap segment

40.3%

42.0%

Directors under 50

18.1%

18.5%

|

|

Insights

Board Index — Finland | H1 2026

Board Index — Finland | H1 2026

In partnership with:

·

5 min read

Momentum on gender, a standstill on nationality

Women held 33.6% of board seats on 1 January and 34.9% by 30 June — a 1.3-point gain in six months, on top of the longer climb from 28.2% in 2022. Most of that climb happened in 2025, when the share jumped 3.0 points — the largest annual move in the series, and a full year before the compliance deadline. Boards with only one woman fell from 26.2% to 21.9% of the market, while boards above the 40% mark rose from 24.0% to 27.8%. Representation is broadening beyond a single seat. Yet the count of all-male boards held flat at eight companies, all of them Small Cap or First North, and the share of women serving as chair slipped from 12.0% (22 companies) to 10.7% (20 companies) — progress in membership has not yet reached the top of the table.

Nationality diversity did not move: Finnish nationals held 77.3% of seats at both the start and end of the period. The figure has sat between 77.3% and 78.2% in every reading since 2022, and the only real move was a 0.9-point fall in the Finnish share during 2025. Internationalisation stays concentrated in a handful of large, global companies and in telecommunications, health care and energy, while industrials, technology and consumer staples remain overwhelmingly domestic. Average board age eased from 57.6 to 57.0 over the half, though boards are older than they were: the average has climbed from 55.7 in 2022, and millennial representation ticked up from 12.0% to 12.2% — renewal at the margin, not in structure.

Highlights
  • Women reached 34.9% of board seats by 30 June, up from 33.6% on 1 January — a 1.3-point H1 gain
  • Women's share rose fastest in 2025 (+3.0 points), a year before the deadline; H1 2026 added 1.3
  • Boards above 40% women rose to 27.8% of the market; single-woman boards fell to 21.9%
  • Eight companies still report fully male boards; the female-chair share slipped to 10.7%
  • Finnish nationals held 77.3% of seats at both the start and close of the half — and between 77.3% and 78.2% in every reading since 2022
  • Average board age eased to 57.0 but is up from 55.7 in 2022, and 47.1% of boards still have no millennial director
  • Large Cap leads on both gender and nationality (42.0% women, 58.4% Finnish); First North is the most homogeneous segment (27.5% women, 86.1% Finnish)
  • Large Cap is used throughout as an approximation of the companies within the directive's scope; the legal test is employee- and size-based, not segment-based
34.9%
of board seats are held by women
77.3%
of directors are Finnish
57.0
years is the average director age (up from 55.7 in 2022)
12.2%
of directors are millennials

From a single seat toward balance

The half shows continued momentum rather than a plateau, with the character of change shifting from "adding a first woman" toward "moving past a single seat." Women rose from 33.6% to 34.9% of all board seats, and the share of boards above 40% women climbed from 24.0% to 27.8%. The pace, however, has slowed: the 3.0-point gain in 2025 was more than double the 1.3 points added in H1 2026. The persistence of eight all-male boards and the dip in female chairs mark where progress has not reached: the smallest companies, and the most senior board role.

Women on boards
% of seats · 2022–2026 H1
Share of womenCompanies with 0 women (%)
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%28.2%30.4%30.6%33.6%34.9%7.5%6.5%6.6%4.4%4.3%2022 End2023 End2024 End2025 End / 2026Start2026 H1 End
Source: Listeds Executive Platform
Figure 1 — Women on boards and companies with zero women, 2022–2026 H1.

Boards with only one woman fell from 26.2% to 21.9% of companies; boards above 40% women rose from 24.0% to 27.8%. All-male boards held flat at eight companies (4.4% to 4.3% of the market). Female chairs slipped from 12.0% (22 companies) to 10.7% (20 companies).

Board gender distribution
% of companies
0 women1 woman2+ women (≤40%)>40% women
1 Jan 202626.2%45.4%24.0%30 Jun 202621.9%46.0%27.8%
Source: Listeds Executive Platform
Figure 2 — Distribution of boards by gender composition, 1 January vs 30 June 2026.
Female board chairs
% of companies
5.0%7.5%10.0%12.5%15.0%7.5%9.7%11.9%12.0%10.7%2022 End2023 End2024 End2025 End / 2026Start2026 H1 End
Source: Listeds Executive Platform
Figure 3 — Female board chairs, 2022–2026 H1.

Still stalled

Finnish nationals accounted for 77.3% of seats at both start and end of the period — no meaningful change. The figure has held between 77.3% and 78.2% in every reading since 2022; the only real move came in 2025, when the Finnish share fell from 78.2% to 77.3%. The most international industries are telecommunications (44.1% Finnish), health care (61.9%), and energy (62.5%) among market segments, Large Cap is the most international (58.4%). The most domestic industries are consumer staples (88.0%) and industrials (85.3%); among segments, Small Cap (87.8%) and First North (86.1%). Despite the continued global expansion of Finnish issuers, board internationalisation has not followed, and new listings still tend to arrive with fully domestic boards.

Board nationality
% of seats
FinnishForeign
2022 End77.7%22.3%2023 End77.6%22.4%2024 End78.2%21.8%2025 End / 2026 Start77.3%22.7%2026 H1 End77.3%22.7%
Source: Listeds Executive Platform
Figure 4 — Board nationality mix, Finnish versus foreign directors, 2022–2026 H1.
“Finnish listed companies are internationalising their business faster than their boards. If a company's growth comes from outside its home market, the board should include at least one director who has relevant business experience from that market. Today's digital board meeting systems make high-quality, frictionless board work possible across borders as well.”
Henrikki Hirvonen
Henrikki HirvonenCountry Manager Finland, Admincontrol

Older over four years, marginally younger this half

Average board age eased from 57.6 to 57.0 over the half, and millennials (born 1980–1999) rose from 12.0% to 12.2% of seats. Over the full series, however, boards have aged by 1.3 years — from 55.7 at the end of 2022. Directors under 50 rose from 18.1% to 18.5%. Companies with no millennial director fell from 50.3% to 47.1% — still nearly half. Boardrooms remain anchored around directors in their late fifties.

Average board age
years
54.055.056.057.058.055.756.156.557.657.02022 End2023 End2024 End2026 Start2026 H1 End
Source: Listeds Executive Platform
Figure 5 — Average board age, 2022–2026 H1 (annual year-end snapshots; 2026 split into 1 Jan and 30 Jun to show the within-half move).
“Diversity is measured by gender, nationality and age because those are measurable. A board's real capability, however, is a question of expertise: does the board's expertise match the tactics and the strategy the company intends to execute over the coming years. Composition is only the starting point. Diverse board work is not automatically effective, because different perspectives produce better decisions only if the way the board works lets them reach the table.”
Henrikki Hirvonen
Henrikki HirvonenCountry Manager Finland, Admincontrol

Large Cap leads, First North lags

Large Cap companies continue to lead on gender and nationality, reaching 42.0% women by 30 June against 58.4% Finnish — the most balanced and most international segment. Small Cap posted the largest H1 gender gain of any segment (29.6% → 32.4%) and has the highest share of Finnish board members (87.8%), while First North remains the most homogeneous segment — the lowest share of women (27.5%) alongside the second-highest Finnish share (86.1%). By industry, consumer staples and technology posted the sharpest gender gains (36.1% → 40.0% and 29.5% → 32.9% respectively), and real estate remains the least gender-diverse at 25.0% women.

Diversity by segment
% · 30 June 2026
WomenForeign
First North (n = 244)27.5%13.9%Small Cap (n = 312)32.4%12.2%Mid Cap (n = 338)37.3%24.0%Large Cap (n = 262)42.0%41.6%
Source: Listeds Executive Platform
Figure 6 — Women and foreign directors by market segment, 30 June 2026. n = total number of directors in the segment.
Industry patterns
  • Consumer staples and technology posted the sharpest gender gain (36.1% → 40.0% women and 29.5% → 32.9% respectively)
  • Consumer staples and basic materials both reached about 40.0% women
  • Telecommunications is the most international (44.1% Finnish); health care (61.9%) and energy (62.5%) follow
  • Real estate remains the least gender-diverse (25.0% women)

Gender — leaders and all-male boards, 30 June 2026

The ten highest of sixteen companies at or above 50% female representation, spanning large caps and small caps alike.

Company

Women (%)

Board size

Suominen

66.7%

6

Aktia Bank

57.1%

7

Verkkokauppa.com

57.1%

7

Huhtamäki

55.6%

9

Fiskars

50.0%

8

Kempower

50.0%

8

Orion

50.0%

8

Stora Enso

50.0%

8

Administer

50.0%

6

Modulight

50.0%

4

Eight companies still reported all-male boards. All of those are either First North or small cap companies.

Company

Women (%)

Board size

Digitalist Group

0%

5

Dovre Group

0%

3

Eagle Filters Group

0%

5

Norrhydro Group

0%

5

Pallas Air

0%

4

Summa Defence

0%

6

Sunborn International

0%

4

Titanium

0%

5

Nationality, age and generational outliers

Companies with the lowest share of Finnish directors are not all the same case. Telia and Tallink Grupp are foreign-domiciled, where a fully non-Finnish board follows from where the company sits. Citycon is the more instructive one: a Finnish-domiciled Oyj that lost its last Finnish director inside this half, when its April AGM cut the board from ten seats to eight. Three of the eight remaining directors are tied to G City, the Israeli controlling shareholder. The board is not internationalising — it is consolidating around its owner.

Company

Finnish (%)

Board size

Telia Company

0%

9

Citycon

0%

8

Tallink Grupp

0%

6

Afarak Group

0%

3

Musti Group

16.7%

6

Nordea Bank

20.0%

10

Tecnotree

20.0%

5

Revenio Group

25.0%

8

Telia Company and Tallink Grupp are foreign-domiciled companies with secondary listings, included because the dataset covers Nasdaq Helsinki and First North Growth Market Finland listings regardless of country of domicile.

Even the youngest boards cluster at or above 45 — Talenom, at 40.8, is the only exception, underlining how rare a truly young board remains in the Finnish market.

Company

Avg birth year

Avg age (2026)

Talenom

1985.2

40.8

Easor

1981.0

45.0

Nokian Panimo

1980.7

45.3

Saga Furs

1978.6

47.4

Trainers' House

1978.4

47.6

Rebl Group

1976.9

49.1

Wulff-Yhtiöt

1976.8

49.2

Siili Solutions

1976.2

49.8

Etteplan

1976.0

50.0

SSH Communications Security

1976.0

50.0

Inderes

1975.8

50.2

LeadDesk

1975.8

50.2

Highest millennial representation

Company

Millennial (%)

Millennial Directors

Talenom

80.0%

4

Nokian Panimo

66.7%

4

Saga Furs

62.5%

5

Lemonsoft

50.0%

3

Easor

50.0%

2

What the next reading will test

The gains ran ahead of what the rule required. Women hold 34.9% of board seats across the market and 42.0% in Large Cap, but the lowest shares sit in small caps and on First North — the segments largely outside the directive's size thresholds.

The open question is whether it continues without a deadline attached to it. Three things to watch: whether the eight all-male boards change at the 2027 AGMs, whether the female-chair share recovers the two chair positions it lost, and whether nationality moves at all after four years of essentially flat readings.

Risks 2026–2028

  • A falling female-chair share suggests the pipeline into board leadership, not only membership, needs attention

  • Persistently domestic boards may weigh on international competitiveness

  • A director base still anchored in its late fifties poses succession questions

  • Most of the four-year gender gain landed in 2025, before the deadline; the H1 2026 pace was roughly half that. Whether the trend survives the deadline is the question the next reading answers

Opportunities 2026–2028

  • The 34.9% market average masks a working model: Large Cap already sits at 42.0%, so the pipeline exists — it has not reached the smaller segments

  • The most international boards sit in the most international industries — telecommunications at 44.1% Finnish, Large Cap segment at 58.4%. Board composition follows the business

At a glance

Metric

1 Jan 2026

30 Jun 2026

Women on boards

33.6%

34.9%

Boards with 0 women

4.4% (8 firms)

4.3% (8 firms)

Boards with 1 woman only

26.2%

21.9%

Boards above 40% women

24.0%

27.8%

Female board chairs

12.0%

10.7%

Finnish directors

77.3%

77.3%

Average board age

57.6

57.0

Millennial directors

12.0%

12.2%

Boards with no millennial

50.3%

47.1%

Women, Large Cap segment

40.3%

42.0%

Directors under 50

18.1%

18.5%

About the partner

Admincontrol provides secure digital solutions for board work and corporate transactions: a board portal, a virtual data room and related transaction services. Its services are used by more than 8,000 companies and more than 200,000 board members and executives, across more than 10,000 transactions.

Admincontrol is part of Euronext Corporate Solutions, headquartered in Paris, France, with a local presence in Norway, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, the United Kingdom and France.

About Listeds

Listeds is a Finnish company specialising in executive data and analysis. The Listeds Executive Intelligence platform tracks executive and board appointments and changes at companies listed in Finland.

About the data

The analysis draws on the Listeds board composition dataset, with snapshots taken at 1 January 2026 (183 companies, 1,123 seats) and 30 June 2026 (187 companies, 1,156 seats). Companies listed on Nasdaq Helsinki and First North Growth Market Finland are included regardless of country of domicile. Regulatory reference: EU Directive 2022/2381 on gender balance on corporate boards, with a compliance deadline of 30 June 2026. The directive offered member states two routes. Finland set the target at 40% of all board members, which in Finnish market practice equals the directive's non-executive route.

In Finland the target applies to a listed company whose average number of employees exceeded 250 in the completed financial year and in the one immediately preceding it, and whose reported balance sheet exceeded €43 million or reported turnover exceeded €50 million (Limited Liability Companies Act 6:9 a). The Act requires companies to aim to achieve the target by 30 June 2026; it attaches no sanction to falling short.

Finnish listed boards are single-tier and, in market practice, composed entirely of non-executive directors — the CEO sits outside the board. The dataset does not separately flag executive board seats, so the all-seats share reported throughout is used as a proxy for the non-executive share. Executive board seats are permissible under the Finnish Limited Liability Companies Act and remain more common outside the listed market.

Age figures are calculated from birth year. Millennials are defined as those born 1980–1999; because ages are derived from birth year alone, an individual age carries up to a year of uncertainty. Nationality is recorded from verifiable evidence only — company disclosures and public records.

The 1 January 2026 snapshot serves as the 2025 year-end reading for every metric except age; there is no separate 2025 datapoint. This substitution does not hold for age: because age is calculated as reporting year minus birth year, the 1 January 2026 snapshot uses 2026 in that calculation, and its age figures should not be read as 2025 year-end ages. The directive's obligations apply to companies meeting its size thresholds; the figures here cover the full Nasdaq Helsinki and First North Growth Market Finland population, including smaller issuers outside its scope.

How to cite: Listeds & Admincontrol, Board Index — Finland H1 2026. Available at: https://listeds.com/articles/board-index-finland-h1-2026.

Board Programme

Built for Nordic listed company boards.

The only programme in the Nordics designed specifically for listed-company board work.
Five sessions, one cohort, twenty leaders in one room - Helsinki, 2026.

Board Programme

Built for Nordic listed company boards.

The only programme in the Nordics designed specifically for listed-company board work.
Five sessions, one cohort, twenty leaders in one room - Helsinki, 2026.

Topics

# Topics

Authors

Founder and ceo

Helene Auramo is a co-founder of Listeds and Nordic Listed Leaders. She has previously co-founded Slush, Indiedays, Zipipop, and Okimo Clinic, building ventures at the intersection of media, technology, and community. She holds board positions at the Finnish Business School Graduates (Suomen Ekonomit) and Finnvera, and serves as Chair of the Investment Committee at the Finnish Business School Graduates. Helene is also a columnist for Talouselämä, Finland’s leading business magazine, and Aamulehti, one of the country’s largest newspapers. Her work focuses on leadership, growth, and the structures that shape decision-making in Nordic companies. She was awarded Future Board Member of the Year in 2022 by Future Board.

Founder and ceo

Helene Auramo is a co-founder of Listeds and Nordic Listed Leaders. She has previously co-founded Slush, Indiedays, Zipipop, and Okimo Clinic, building ventures at the intersection of media, technology, and community. She holds board positions at the Finnish Business School Graduates (Suomen Ekonomit) and Finnvera, and serves as Chair of the Investment Committee at the Finnish Business School Graduates. Helene is also a columnist for Talouselämä, Finland’s leading business magazine, and Aamulehti, one of the country’s largest newspapers. Her work focuses on leadership, growth, and the structures that shape decision-making in Nordic companies. She was awarded Future Board Member of the Year in 2022 by Future Board.

Photo of Maksymilian Zając

Maksymilian Zając is a junior data analyst at Listeds, covering Nordic leadership changes, shareholder lists and MAR transactions.

Photo of Maksymilian Zając

Maksymilian Zając is a junior data analyst at Listeds, covering Nordic leadership changes, shareholder lists and MAR transactions.

Authors

Founder and ceo

Helene Auramo is a co-founder of Listeds and Nordic Listed Leaders. She has previously co-founded Slush, Indiedays, Zipipop, and Okimo Clinic, building ventures at the intersection of media, technology, and community. She holds board positions at the Finnish Business School Graduates (Suomen Ekonomit) and Finnvera, and serves as Chair of the Investment Committee at the Finnish Business School Graduates. Helene is also a columnist for Talouselämä, Finland’s leading business magazine, and Aamulehti, one of the country’s largest newspapers. Her work focuses on leadership, growth, and the structures that shape decision-making in Nordic companies. She was awarded Future Board Member of the Year in 2022 by Future Board.

Maksymilian Zając is a junior data analyst at Listeds, covering Nordic leadership changes, shareholder lists and MAR transactions.

All Listeds newsletters (bundle)

One sign-up, the full picture.

Get every Listeds newsletter: the daily signal drumbeat, the weekly Pulse briefing, the monthly Best of the Month, the CEO letter, and the Weekend read.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy

All Listeds newsletters (bundle)

One sign-up, the full picture.

Get every Listeds newsletter: the daily signal drumbeat, the weekly Pulse briefing, the monthly Best of the Month, the CEO letter, and the Weekend read.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy

Latest signalsLive feed
Moves trackerLive feed

Investor Event

Listeds Investor Event · Defence

Nordic defence is in a once-in-a-generation growth cycle. Eight listed and pre-IPO companies pitch to 100+ invited investors at Valkoinen Sali, Helsinki

21 September 2026

Latest on Listeds

Leadership Moves

Lars Bell arrives at the end of SSH's rebuild. The share is up 49.5% in five days.

Sep 9, 2026

Since January, SSH Communications Security has lowered its sales outlook, watched an incoming chief financial officer withdraw before her start date, and completed a tender offer on its convertible capital securities. Lars Bell's appointment as chief executive, announced 3 September and effective 1 October, is the most visible event in that sequence. It is not the first.

Read on its own, a planned CEO succession looks orderly. Read against the year behind it, it is the last announced piece of a rebuild that began eight months earlier.

The share price read it the other way round. Most of that sequence passed with barely a mark: the three CFO events moved the share −2.2%, +0.5% and −0.5%. Then, in the five sessions to 7 September, SSH's share (SSH1V, Nasdaq Helsinki) rose from EUR 1.786 to EUR 2.67, up 49.5%, on 569,004 shares against August's 403,172 across 21 sessions.

Three CFO plans, and a quarter with EBITDA negative

SSH lowered its 2025 net sales outlook on 2 January. Full-year 2025 net sales came in down 2.4%; Q1 2026 turned EBITDA negative; Q2 revenue recovered to EUR 5.7 million, up 6.8% year on year, while EBITDA was down 40.7%.

The finance seat moved three times in three months. Maria Alahuhta was appointed CFO on 2 April, her start date was brought forward to 1 October, and on 12 June SSH disclosed she would not take up the role. Cristian Arias was appointed on 7 July, starting 1 October, the same day Bell begins.

What the market paid for

Date

Event

Close (EUR)

Move

Volume

15 Jan

Two New Partnerships with COMIT Corporation in Vietnam and ChyunYao in Taiwan. 

3.47

+24.4%

607,544

17 Feb

FY2025 results

2.41

−6.9%

176,389

2 Apr

Alahuhta appointed CFO

2.19

−2.2%

33,058

12 Jun

Alahuhta withdraws

2.10

+0.5%

40,611

7 Jul

Arias appointed CFO

1.98

−0.5%

38,468

17 Jul

CEO retirement + Q2

2.035

−8.7%

39,444

3 Sep

Bell appointed CEO

2.11

+11.1%

98,535

7 Sep

Bank selects PrivX for Zero Trust


2.67

+18.7%

209,389

Three CFO events: −2.2%, +0.5%, −0.5%. None traded an average day's volume for the year (55,597 shares). On the day SSH disclosed that an incoming CFO would not take up the role, the share rose half a per cent on 40,611 shares.

The disclosures that did move it were the outlook cut on 2 January (−7.9%), the full-year results on 17 February (−6.9%), and the CEO seat. The 17 July release, which carried the retirement of Rami Raulas alongside the Q2 figures, took the share down 8.7% that day, and 18.2% from the 16 July close to the 23 July close.

The largest single day of the September run came two sessions after the appointment was public, on 7 September, +18.7%, as one of the world's largest banks selected SSH Communications Security's PrivX solution to implement Zero Trust with Zero Standing Access. 

Same buyer, different product

Bell comes from Omada A/S, where he was Chief Customer Officer and, from November 2025 to April 2026, interim chief executive. Before that: chief executive of Pedab Denmark, and long tenures at Microsoft, HP and IBM: more than twenty-five years in enterprise software.

His discipline is Identity Governance and Administration. SSH sells Zero Trust privileged access and quantum-safe network encryption. The two compete for the same security budget and often reach the same buyer, but they are not the same product. 

What to watch

Bell and Arias both start on 1 October, which makes SSH's Q3 report the first disclosure a rebuilt executive team owns rather than inherits. It is also the first test of whether the Q2 revenue recovery survives these changes.

Columnists

The Next Nordic advantage‌ - What if talent, capital and innovation start flowing north?‌

Sep 8, 2026

Geopolitical discussions have been framed through the lens of the Global West, Global East and Global South. Recently, a fourth concept has started to emerge in strategic discussions: the Global North.

The term is usually used more broadly to describe the developed world as a whole. In this column, I deliberately narrow it to the Nordic region because it represents a distinctive institutional model.

I first encountered the idea when Finland's President Alexander Stubb discussed the possibility of the Global North as an emerging geopolitical force during an interview on Ykkösaamu, one of Finland's leading current affairs programmes, in February 2026.
Strong Nordic cooperation is one dimension of this thinking.

Are we moving towards a new geopolitical geometry? The significance of the North has grown in recent years through developments such as NATO's enlargement and the increasing strategic importance of the Arctic region. The Arctic has received unprecedented international attention, not only because of security concerns, but also because of its growing relevance for energy, infrastructure, logistics and critical resources. 

The growing strategic importance of the Nordic region is reflected for instance in NATO's decision to establish its Forward Land Forces Multinational Staff Element in Rovaniemi, creating a permanent NATO presence in Northern Finland.

In 2026, the U.S. Coast Guard moved forward with plans to procure 11 new icebreakers from Finland, relying heavily on Finnish icebreaker expertise and shipbuilding capabilities.

The Nordic Effect

For decades, the United States has been the world's dominant magnet for talent, capital and innovation. Yet recent policy shifts and a growing emphasis on "America First" raise a strategic question worth putting to a board: What if America First ultimately makes America less attractive to global talent, capital and ideas? It is a possibility worth exploring. What if a more fragmented geopolitical environment gradually disperses global flows of talent, investment and innovation? What if some of these flows begin seeking more predictable destinations? This is where the Global North starts to matter commercially.

The defining characteristics of the Nordic region include stable societies, low levels of corruption, strong educational systems, safety and security, a strong rule of law, well-functioning institutions, advanced innovation ecosystems and a long tradition of diplomacy and cooperation. These are often described as social strengths. In an increasingly fragmented world, they may also become strategic economic assets.
For instance The World Justice Project's Rule of Law Index 2025 ranked Denmark 1st, with Norway and Finland immediately behind among the strongest rule-of-law countries in the world. Nordic countries also perform exceptionally well in innovation: in the Global Innovation Index 2024

When political risk increases elsewhere, predictability itself may become a competitive advantage and characteristics of an attractive investment environment. 

How could your company benefit if the Nordic region became an increasingly attractive destination for talent, investment and innovation?

No Nordic country can compete with the United States or China on scale alone. Together, however, the region represents a globally relevant platform for innovation, technology, research and investment. The four Nordic exchanges — Helsinki, Stockholm, Copenhagen and Oslo — are already a single functioning market.

Another signal of deeper Nordic integration can be seen in capital markets. In August 2026, Bloomberg reported that the Nordic Compass initiative was exploring a common Nordic stock exchange bringing together the markets of Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland. The initiative includes major Nordic actors such as Wallenberg Investments, EQT, Nordea, Nokia, Kone, Nasdaq and the Novo Nordisk Foundation. Its stated ambition is to strengthen the region's ability to compete for capital and support growth companies at a scale that individual Nordic markets struggle to achieve alone. Such discussions suggest that the idea of the Nordics acting as a more integrated economic platform is already moving from geopolitical speculation into practical business strategy.

If the twentieth century rewarded scale and the early twenty-first century rewarded speed, the next decade may reward trusted collaboration.

What's Next?

Whether the Global North emerges as a recognised centre of power remains uncertain. But uncertainty is precisely why boards should explore the possibility.

One of the core purposes of strategic foresight is not to predict what will happen, but to expand the range of possibilities organisations are prepared for. The most valuable strategic question is rarely "What will happen?" It is "What becomes possible if this happens?"

For boards, a practical starting point is visioning.

Imagine it is 2035 and the Global North has become one of the world's most attractive destinations for talent, investment and innovation.

  • What would be the desired role that your company wants to play in that future? 

  • What capabilities would that require?

  • Which partnerships should be built today?

  • What opportunities might competitors overlook?

The companies that benefit most from emerging shifts are rarely those that predict the future correctly. They are those that recognise new possibilities early and position themselves accordingly. 

The future is built, not forecast.

Minna Koskelo

Founder and CEO, 11Helsinki

She is also Founder and Chair of the Board of Futures Finland, a founding organisation of the Nordic Foresight Network. Her work focuses on strategic foresight, helping organisations turn foresight into action.

Nordic Foresight

Minna Koskelo

The Nordic Foresight Network is a network of foresight professionals advancing futures thinking across the Nordic region.

Nordic Foresight Network

The Nordic Foresight Column is a monthly series by Nordic Foresight Network in which foresight professionals from the five Nordic countries examine the shifts shaping the region.

Latest on Listeds

Leadership Moves

Lars Bell arrives at the end of SSH's rebuild. The share is up 49.5% in five days.

Sep 9, 2026

Since January, SSH Communications Security has lowered its sales outlook, watched an incoming chief financial officer withdraw before her start date, and completed a tender offer on its convertible capital securities. Lars Bell's appointment as chief executive, announced 3 September and effective 1 October, is the most visible event in that sequence. It is not the first.

Read on its own, a planned CEO succession looks orderly. Read against the year behind it, it is the last announced piece of a rebuild that began eight months earlier.

The share price read it the other way round. Most of that sequence passed with barely a mark: the three CFO events moved the share −2.2%, +0.5% and −0.5%. Then, in the five sessions to 7 September, SSH's share (SSH1V, Nasdaq Helsinki) rose from EUR 1.786 to EUR 2.67, up 49.5%, on 569,004 shares against August's 403,172 across 21 sessions.

Three CFO plans, and a quarter with EBITDA negative

SSH lowered its 2025 net sales outlook on 2 January. Full-year 2025 net sales came in down 2.4%; Q1 2026 turned EBITDA negative; Q2 revenue recovered to EUR 5.7 million, up 6.8% year on year, while EBITDA was down 40.7%.

The finance seat moved three times in three months. Maria Alahuhta was appointed CFO on 2 April, her start date was brought forward to 1 October, and on 12 June SSH disclosed she would not take up the role. Cristian Arias was appointed on 7 July, starting 1 October, the same day Bell begins.

What the market paid for

Date

Event

Close (EUR)

Move

Volume

15 Jan

Two New Partnerships with COMIT Corporation in Vietnam and ChyunYao in Taiwan. 

3.47

+24.4%

607,544

17 Feb

FY2025 results

2.41

−6.9%

176,389

2 Apr

Alahuhta appointed CFO

2.19

−2.2%

33,058

12 Jun

Alahuhta withdraws

2.10

+0.5%

40,611

7 Jul

Arias appointed CFO

1.98

−0.5%

38,468

17 Jul

CEO retirement + Q2

2.035

−8.7%

39,444

3 Sep

Bell appointed CEO

2.11

+11.1%

98,535

7 Sep

Bank selects PrivX for Zero Trust


2.67

+18.7%

209,389

Three CFO events: −2.2%, +0.5%, −0.5%. None traded an average day's volume for the year (55,597 shares). On the day SSH disclosed that an incoming CFO would not take up the role, the share rose half a per cent on 40,611 shares.

The disclosures that did move it were the outlook cut on 2 January (−7.9%), the full-year results on 17 February (−6.9%), and the CEO seat. The 17 July release, which carried the retirement of Rami Raulas alongside the Q2 figures, took the share down 8.7% that day, and 18.2% from the 16 July close to the 23 July close.

The largest single day of the September run came two sessions after the appointment was public, on 7 September, +18.7%, as one of the world's largest banks selected SSH Communications Security's PrivX solution to implement Zero Trust with Zero Standing Access. 

Same buyer, different product

Bell comes from Omada A/S, where he was Chief Customer Officer and, from November 2025 to April 2026, interim chief executive. Before that: chief executive of Pedab Denmark, and long tenures at Microsoft, HP and IBM: more than twenty-five years in enterprise software.

His discipline is Identity Governance and Administration. SSH sells Zero Trust privileged access and quantum-safe network encryption. The two compete for the same security budget and often reach the same buyer, but they are not the same product. 

What to watch

Bell and Arias both start on 1 October, which makes SSH's Q3 report the first disclosure a rebuilt executive team owns rather than inherits. It is also the first test of whether the Q2 revenue recovery survives these changes.

Columnists

The Next Nordic advantage‌ - What if talent, capital and innovation start flowing north?‌

Sep 8, 2026

Geopolitical discussions have been framed through the lens of the Global West, Global East and Global South. Recently, a fourth concept has started to emerge in strategic discussions: the Global North.

The term is usually used more broadly to describe the developed world as a whole. In this column, I deliberately narrow it to the Nordic region because it represents a distinctive institutional model.

I first encountered the idea when Finland's President Alexander Stubb discussed the possibility of the Global North as an emerging geopolitical force during an interview on Ykkösaamu, one of Finland's leading current affairs programmes, in February 2026.
Strong Nordic cooperation is one dimension of this thinking.

Are we moving towards a new geopolitical geometry? The significance of the North has grown in recent years through developments such as NATO's enlargement and the increasing strategic importance of the Arctic region. The Arctic has received unprecedented international attention, not only because of security concerns, but also because of its growing relevance for energy, infrastructure, logistics and critical resources. 

The growing strategic importance of the Nordic region is reflected for instance in NATO's decision to establish its Forward Land Forces Multinational Staff Element in Rovaniemi, creating a permanent NATO presence in Northern Finland.

In 2026, the U.S. Coast Guard moved forward with plans to procure 11 new icebreakers from Finland, relying heavily on Finnish icebreaker expertise and shipbuilding capabilities.

The Nordic Effect

For decades, the United States has been the world's dominant magnet for talent, capital and innovation. Yet recent policy shifts and a growing emphasis on "America First" raise a strategic question worth putting to a board: What if America First ultimately makes America less attractive to global talent, capital and ideas? It is a possibility worth exploring. What if a more fragmented geopolitical environment gradually disperses global flows of talent, investment and innovation? What if some of these flows begin seeking more predictable destinations? This is where the Global North starts to matter commercially.

The defining characteristics of the Nordic region include stable societies, low levels of corruption, strong educational systems, safety and security, a strong rule of law, well-functioning institutions, advanced innovation ecosystems and a long tradition of diplomacy and cooperation. These are often described as social strengths. In an increasingly fragmented world, they may also become strategic economic assets.
For instance The World Justice Project's Rule of Law Index 2025 ranked Denmark 1st, with Norway and Finland immediately behind among the strongest rule-of-law countries in the world. Nordic countries also perform exceptionally well in innovation: in the Global Innovation Index 2024

When political risk increases elsewhere, predictability itself may become a competitive advantage and characteristics of an attractive investment environment. 

How could your company benefit if the Nordic region became an increasingly attractive destination for talent, investment and innovation?

No Nordic country can compete with the United States or China on scale alone. Together, however, the region represents a globally relevant platform for innovation, technology, research and investment. The four Nordic exchanges — Helsinki, Stockholm, Copenhagen and Oslo — are already a single functioning market.

Another signal of deeper Nordic integration can be seen in capital markets. In August 2026, Bloomberg reported that the Nordic Compass initiative was exploring a common Nordic stock exchange bringing together the markets of Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland. The initiative includes major Nordic actors such as Wallenberg Investments, EQT, Nordea, Nokia, Kone, Nasdaq and the Novo Nordisk Foundation. Its stated ambition is to strengthen the region's ability to compete for capital and support growth companies at a scale that individual Nordic markets struggle to achieve alone. Such discussions suggest that the idea of the Nordics acting as a more integrated economic platform is already moving from geopolitical speculation into practical business strategy.

If the twentieth century rewarded scale and the early twenty-first century rewarded speed, the next decade may reward trusted collaboration.

What's Next?

Whether the Global North emerges as a recognised centre of power remains uncertain. But uncertainty is precisely why boards should explore the possibility.

One of the core purposes of strategic foresight is not to predict what will happen, but to expand the range of possibilities organisations are prepared for. The most valuable strategic question is rarely "What will happen?" It is "What becomes possible if this happens?"

For boards, a practical starting point is visioning.

Imagine it is 2035 and the Global North has become one of the world's most attractive destinations for talent, investment and innovation.

  • What would be the desired role that your company wants to play in that future? 

  • What capabilities would that require?

  • Which partnerships should be built today?

  • What opportunities might competitors overlook?

The companies that benefit most from emerging shifts are rarely those that predict the future correctly. They are those that recognise new possibilities early and position themselves accordingly. 

The future is built, not forecast.

Minna Koskelo

Founder and CEO, 11Helsinki

She is also Founder and Chair of the Board of Futures Finland, a founding organisation of the Nordic Foresight Network. Her work focuses on strategic foresight, helping organisations turn foresight into action.

Nordic Foresight

Minna Koskelo

The Nordic Foresight Network is a network of foresight professionals advancing futures thinking across the Nordic region.

Nordic Foresight Network

The Nordic Foresight Column is a monthly series by Nordic Foresight Network in which foresight professionals from the five Nordic countries examine the shifts shaping the region.

Latest on Listeds

Leadership Moves

Lars Bell arrives at the end of SSH's rebuild. The share is up 49.5% in five days.

Sep 9, 2026

Since January, SSH Communications Security has lowered its sales outlook, watched an incoming chief financial officer withdraw before her start date, and completed a tender offer on its convertible capital securities. Lars Bell's appointment as chief executive, announced 3 September and effective 1 October, is the most visible event in that sequence. It is not the first.

Read on its own, a planned CEO succession looks orderly. Read against the year behind it, it is the last announced piece of a rebuild that began eight months earlier.

The share price read it the other way round. Most of that sequence passed with barely a mark: the three CFO events moved the share −2.2%, +0.5% and −0.5%. Then, in the five sessions to 7 September, SSH's share (SSH1V, Nasdaq Helsinki) rose from EUR 1.786 to EUR 2.67, up 49.5%, on 569,004 shares against August's 403,172 across 21 sessions.

Three CFO plans, and a quarter with EBITDA negative

SSH lowered its 2025 net sales outlook on 2 January. Full-year 2025 net sales came in down 2.4%; Q1 2026 turned EBITDA negative; Q2 revenue recovered to EUR 5.7 million, up 6.8% year on year, while EBITDA was down 40.7%.

The finance seat moved three times in three months. Maria Alahuhta was appointed CFO on 2 April, her start date was brought forward to 1 October, and on 12 June SSH disclosed she would not take up the role. Cristian Arias was appointed on 7 July, starting 1 October, the same day Bell begins.

What the market paid for

Date

Event

Close (EUR)

Move

Volume

15 Jan

Two New Partnerships with COMIT Corporation in Vietnam and ChyunYao in Taiwan. 

3.47

+24.4%

607,544

17 Feb

FY2025 results

2.41

−6.9%

176,389

2 Apr

Alahuhta appointed CFO

2.19

−2.2%

33,058

12 Jun

Alahuhta withdraws

2.10

+0.5%

40,611

7 Jul

Arias appointed CFO

1.98

−0.5%

38,468

17 Jul

CEO retirement + Q2

2.035

−8.7%

39,444

3 Sep

Bell appointed CEO

2.11

+11.1%

98,535

7 Sep

Bank selects PrivX for Zero Trust


2.67

+18.7%

209,389

Three CFO events: −2.2%, +0.5%, −0.5%. None traded an average day's volume for the year (55,597 shares). On the day SSH disclosed that an incoming CFO would not take up the role, the share rose half a per cent on 40,611 shares.

The disclosures that did move it were the outlook cut on 2 January (−7.9%), the full-year results on 17 February (−6.9%), and the CEO seat. The 17 July release, which carried the retirement of Rami Raulas alongside the Q2 figures, took the share down 8.7% that day, and 18.2% from the 16 July close to the 23 July close.

The largest single day of the September run came two sessions after the appointment was public, on 7 September, +18.7%, as one of the world's largest banks selected SSH Communications Security's PrivX solution to implement Zero Trust with Zero Standing Access. 

Same buyer, different product

Bell comes from Omada A/S, where he was Chief Customer Officer and, from November 2025 to April 2026, interim chief executive. Before that: chief executive of Pedab Denmark, and long tenures at Microsoft, HP and IBM: more than twenty-five years in enterprise software.

His discipline is Identity Governance and Administration. SSH sells Zero Trust privileged access and quantum-safe network encryption. The two compete for the same security budget and often reach the same buyer, but they are not the same product. 

What to watch

Bell and Arias both start on 1 October, which makes SSH's Q3 report the first disclosure a rebuilt executive team owns rather than inherits. It is also the first test of whether the Q2 revenue recovery survives these changes.

Columnists

The Next Nordic advantage‌ - What if talent, capital and innovation start flowing north?‌

Sep 8, 2026

Geopolitical discussions have been framed through the lens of the Global West, Global East and Global South. Recently, a fourth concept has started to emerge in strategic discussions: the Global North.

The term is usually used more broadly to describe the developed world as a whole. In this column, I deliberately narrow it to the Nordic region because it represents a distinctive institutional model.

I first encountered the idea when Finland's President Alexander Stubb discussed the possibility of the Global North as an emerging geopolitical force during an interview on Ykkösaamu, one of Finland's leading current affairs programmes, in February 2026.
Strong Nordic cooperation is one dimension of this thinking.

Are we moving towards a new geopolitical geometry? The significance of the North has grown in recent years through developments such as NATO's enlargement and the increasing strategic importance of the Arctic region. The Arctic has received unprecedented international attention, not only because of security concerns, but also because of its growing relevance for energy, infrastructure, logistics and critical resources. 

The growing strategic importance of the Nordic region is reflected for instance in NATO's decision to establish its Forward Land Forces Multinational Staff Element in Rovaniemi, creating a permanent NATO presence in Northern Finland.

In 2026, the U.S. Coast Guard moved forward with plans to procure 11 new icebreakers from Finland, relying heavily on Finnish icebreaker expertise and shipbuilding capabilities.

The Nordic Effect

For decades, the United States has been the world's dominant magnet for talent, capital and innovation. Yet recent policy shifts and a growing emphasis on "America First" raise a strategic question worth putting to a board: What if America First ultimately makes America less attractive to global talent, capital and ideas? It is a possibility worth exploring. What if a more fragmented geopolitical environment gradually disperses global flows of talent, investment and innovation? What if some of these flows begin seeking more predictable destinations? This is where the Global North starts to matter commercially.

The defining characteristics of the Nordic region include stable societies, low levels of corruption, strong educational systems, safety and security, a strong rule of law, well-functioning institutions, advanced innovation ecosystems and a long tradition of diplomacy and cooperation. These are often described as social strengths. In an increasingly fragmented world, they may also become strategic economic assets.
For instance The World Justice Project's Rule of Law Index 2025 ranked Denmark 1st, with Norway and Finland immediately behind among the strongest rule-of-law countries in the world. Nordic countries also perform exceptionally well in innovation: in the Global Innovation Index 2024

When political risk increases elsewhere, predictability itself may become a competitive advantage and characteristics of an attractive investment environment. 

How could your company benefit if the Nordic region became an increasingly attractive destination for talent, investment and innovation?

No Nordic country can compete with the United States or China on scale alone. Together, however, the region represents a globally relevant platform for innovation, technology, research and investment. The four Nordic exchanges — Helsinki, Stockholm, Copenhagen and Oslo — are already a single functioning market.

Another signal of deeper Nordic integration can be seen in capital markets. In August 2026, Bloomberg reported that the Nordic Compass initiative was exploring a common Nordic stock exchange bringing together the markets of Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland. The initiative includes major Nordic actors such as Wallenberg Investments, EQT, Nordea, Nokia, Kone, Nasdaq and the Novo Nordisk Foundation. Its stated ambition is to strengthen the region's ability to compete for capital and support growth companies at a scale that individual Nordic markets struggle to achieve alone. Such discussions suggest that the idea of the Nordics acting as a more integrated economic platform is already moving from geopolitical speculation into practical business strategy.

If the twentieth century rewarded scale and the early twenty-first century rewarded speed, the next decade may reward trusted collaboration.

What's Next?

Whether the Global North emerges as a recognised centre of power remains uncertain. But uncertainty is precisely why boards should explore the possibility.

One of the core purposes of strategic foresight is not to predict what will happen, but to expand the range of possibilities organisations are prepared for. The most valuable strategic question is rarely "What will happen?" It is "What becomes possible if this happens?"

For boards, a practical starting point is visioning.

Imagine it is 2035 and the Global North has become one of the world's most attractive destinations for talent, investment and innovation.

  • What would be the desired role that your company wants to play in that future? 

  • What capabilities would that require?

  • Which partnerships should be built today?

  • What opportunities might competitors overlook?

The companies that benefit most from emerging shifts are rarely those that predict the future correctly. They are those that recognise new possibilities early and position themselves accordingly. 

The future is built, not forecast.

Minna Koskelo

Founder and CEO, 11Helsinki

She is also Founder and Chair of the Board of Futures Finland, a founding organisation of the Nordic Foresight Network. Her work focuses on strategic foresight, helping organisations turn foresight into action.

Nordic Foresight

Minna Koskelo

The Nordic Foresight Network is a network of foresight professionals advancing futures thinking across the Nordic region.

Nordic Foresight Network

The Nordic Foresight Column is a monthly series by Nordic Foresight Network in which foresight professionals from the five Nordic countries examine the shifts shaping the region.

Join our Pulse, Best-of-the-Week, and Weekend newsletters

Join our Pulse, Best-of-the-Week, and Weekend newsletters