Articles

Category

All

Leaders

Business

Voices

Insights

Category

All

Leaders

Business

Voices

Insights

Market Signals

Rainmaker buys Inhouse Group to close its B2B gap ahead of a possible First North listing

Oct 7, 2026

Rainmaker has agreed to buy all shares in Yellow Holding, owner of B2B sales outsourcer Inhouse Group, and is investigating a listing on Nasdaq First North Growth Market Finland. The Finnish sales and customer service outsourcer had 2025 turnover of EUR 45.9 million.

Rainmaker buys Inhouse to close the gap on its EUR 7 million B2B target 

Rainmaker aims to grow its B2B business to around EUR 7 million by the end of its 2025 to 2027 strategy period. B2B sales revenue was EUR 1.6 million in the first half, up from EUR 1.0 million. Two pilot assignments did not move into production, and volumes in its SDR service fell in spring before recovering in early summer. Inhouse covers prospecting, customer acquisition and appointment booking, and will keep its own brand. The purchase price was not disclosed.

“Inhouse Group has built a strong position in demanding B2B solution sales and developed operating models that perfectly complement Rainmaker's business entity. The acquisition supports our strategy to grow and strengthens our position as a growth partner for our customers,” says Tapio Korttilalli, CEO of Rainmaker, in the press release.

Inhouse follows two acquisitions in the first half of 2026

In February, Rainmaker bought telephone sales company Myyntimestarit and its roughly 60 sales professionals. It also bought Digizer's e-commerce customer service business.  First-half revenue rose 14.2% to EUR 24.6 million, with organic growth of 10.6% and acquisitions adding 3.6 percentage points. Comparable EBITDA rose to EUR 1.7 million, or 7.0% of revenue, the bottom of its 7 to 10% medium-term target range.

The balance sheet has been rebuilt for a listing since spring

In June, pension insurer Veritas subscribed EUR 2.0 million of new shares, equal to 11.76% of shares after registration. “The company's growth prospects and market position create a solid foundation for the company's future development and it is really great to be part of this story,” says Theo Laakso, portfolio manager at Veritas.

Interest-bearing net debt fell to EUR 5.6 million from EUR 9.7 million a year earlier, or 1.5 times rolling EBITDA. In July, several loan arrangements were replaced with a single long-term facility with fewer covenants.

Two holding companies own more than 90% of the shares

Before the Veritas shares were registered, GTW Group held 58.56% of Rainmaker and Divest Group 34.34%. The company says a listing would strengthen its capital structure and fund organic and acquisition-driven growth. A new company form, an outside equity investor and simpler debt all point the same way. The Inhouse deal gives prospective investors a first look at what a listing would pay for.

Leadership Moves

Boreo names Lassi Simola CFO, ending nearly a year of a split finance function

Oct 6, 2026

Boreo has appointed Lassi Simola, currently Workout and Restructuring Executive at Nordea, as Chief Financial Officer and a member of the Group Management Team. He starts no later than 4 January 2027, ending an interim arrangement that has divided the finance role between two people since February.

Boreo brings back a CFO after deciding in February to manage without one

In December 2025, Boreo announced that CFO Jesse Petäjä would step down and said it had started recruiting a successor. In February 2026, it changed course and decided not to appoint a CFO for the time being. Rafael Osmanov became Head of M&A and Financing, and Vice President Finance Sami Hanerva took over financial reporting.

Once Simola starts, Hanerva will report to him in his current role. Osmanov will support the onboarding, and his contract ends by the end of March 2027.

The new CFO and the CEO both come from private equity and consulting dealmaking

Simola has more than 15 years in finance, over 10 of them in private equity, and is a CFA charterholder. Tuomas Kahri, CEO since 1 April 2026, was previously a partner at McKinsey & Company and Intera Partners. The hire is the first CFO appointment under Kahri.

“Lassi brings to Boreo strong expertise in mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance. He has extensive experience working with small and medium-sized companies and possesses an excellent understanding of the challenges and opportunities these businesses face,” says Tuomas Kahri, CEO of Boreo, in the press release.

Boreo has spent 2026 preparing its balance sheet for acquisitions

Boreo grew 2025 net sales by 14% to EUR 153.3 million and operational EBIT by 17% to EUR 8.0 million, and its board proposed no dividend to strengthen the financial position. The April 2026 AGM approved that proposal. First-half 2026 net sales rose 14% to EUR 84.6 million, operational EBIT rose 21% to EUR 4.3 million, and operating cash flow improved to EUR 3.7 million.

The portfolio is moving in both directions. In July, subsidiary Floby Nya Bilverkstad sold its vehicle painting business Lackmästar'n. On 1 October, Boreo bought technical textiles maker TEXpro for an enterprise value of EUR 1.6 million, paid from existing cash.

“With its strengthened financial position and renewed focus on acquisitions, I believe the company is well positioned to pursue its growth strategy,” says Lassi Simola.

TEXpro, with EUR 1.7 million in net sales, shows the scale of Boreo's deals so far this year. A CFO hired for his acquisition record suggests the board expects that scale to grow.

Columnists

Who will build the next shared vision?

Oct 6, 2026

Currently there appears to be a widespread feeling of rising uncertainty and a lack of a shared vision for the future. During Sweden’s recent election campaign commentators repeatedly asked where the larger visions for the country had gone. Amid promises of quick fixes and tactical positioning, the question of what society we should build seemed harder to answer. Similar examples with voices calling for a new vision have also been heard in the other Nordic countries recently. The most obvious example is perhaps Finnish Sitra that explicitly describes the need for “an inspiring new promise about the future”. 

Considering the turbulent situation in the world in the last decade, it is perhaps not surprising that we find feelings of uncertainty. It is in fact something we could expect if we apply the long-term cyclical perspective of thinkers such as Neil Howe who describes how long cycles shape the characteristics of our societies and how the change from cycle to cycle typically results in crises. Viewed through the ‘wheel of seasons’ model developed by my colleagues Mats Lindgren and Jörgen Jedbratt, our current situation may represent a transition from winter to spring, during which crises will lead to new dominant paradigms. If reality were to follow the model, this should mean that we are slowly shifting towards an increased focus on long-term perspectives and finally also a rising belief in a positive future. 

Another sign of the uncertainty is the rising interest in scenario planning. This is a well-known pattern that goes back to the oil crisis of the 1970s when Shell’s scenario planning rose to fame and it is now perhaps the most familiar tool in the foresight toolbox. There is furthermore a general acceptance of scenario planning as a relevant tool for our time, but if we want to get broad participation and support for changes the map provided by the scenarios also needs to be accompanied by something more visionary.

The Nordic effect

So, if we are approaching a period of renewal maybe it is time to start thinking about how Nordic companies and other organisations could help bring this new future into being and shape it? How can we contribute to the creation of a new vision that can guide and speed up necessary changes so that we can balance sustainability and resilience, productivity and family life, and so on? Even though there exists a joint Nordic vision for 2030 that was adopted by the Nordic Council of Ministers in 2019 this is apparently not sufficient (and to be honest, how many of you have read it? I have, but that’s more or less required as part of my job). 

Maybe it is safe to say that it is time for a new Nordic vision? And maybe this time we should start the process as soon as possible ourselves in our own organisations so that we together can create small pieces of the great puzzle that would make up a new shared vision.

For boards, this means connecting the vision to investment priorities, capabilities and partnerships, and deciding how the organisation can contribute to a wider Nordic ambition.

Questions we need to answer in this process include:

  1. What future do we want to contribute to over the next ten to fifteen years?

  2. What can we influence? Which partners and capabilities will we need?

  3. What decisions do we need to make?

The last point may seem a bit obvious but as most of us know, foresight without action means nothing. There is in fact even a risk that foresight in some cases could become counterproductive and hinder necessary changes.

Decades ago, Kets de Vries and Miller described how some organisations become trapped in endless studies and analyses without taking action. Today, the abundance of foresight consultants and methods can give this tendency even more room to grow. An organisation may find itself contemplating a million possible futures, watching doors close one by one while trying to identify the perfect course of action. Foresight should help us choose a direction, prepare for different outcomes and move forward. A good analysis that leads to action is better than a perfect analysis that does not.

What's next

Let’s apply the tools from our foresight toolkits and start working! A new shared vision is needed and unless you take part in shaping it someone else will. So, let’s start small in our own organisations and launch processes to formulate our own visions and in this process also define our roles and purpose. This is often best done using collaborative methods – not just for the formulation of the vision but also to get people on board from the start because another thing that we need to remember is this. Scenarios and visions can give us a map of the future. But we still have to make the journey ourselves.

Johan Hammarlund

Collaborative Foresight Advisor, Kairos Future

Johan Hammarlund is a Senior Consultant at Kairos Future, a leading foresight and strategy consultancy that for more than 30 years has helped organisations anticipate change, explore future opportunities, and design strategies for long-term success. Johan specialises in collaborative foresight and democratic innovations and is active in professional networks across Sweden, the Nordic region and Europe.

Johan Hammarlund

Nordic Foresight

The Nordic Foresight Network is a network of foresight professionals advancing futures thinking across the Nordic region.

Nordic Foresight Network

Sources 

  1. Mats Lindgren - Winter is Coming or Springtime with Trump, 2016

  2. Kets de Vries and Miller - The Neurotic Organization, 1984

  3. Neil Howe - The Fourth Turning: Why American 'Crisis' May Last Until 2030, 2020

  4. Monteiro and Dal Borgo - Supporting decision making with strategic foresight, 2023

  5. Nordic prime ministers - Our Vision 2030, 2019

  6. Anna Solovjew-Wartiovaara - Sitra Megatrends Report, 2026

Columnists

Who will build the next shared vision?

Oct 6, 2026

Currently there appears to be a widespread feeling of rising uncertainty and a lack of a shared vision for the future. During Sweden’s recent election campaign commentators repeatedly asked where the larger visions for the country had gone. Amid promises of quick fixes and tactical positioning, the question of what society we should build seemed harder to answer. Similar examples with voices calling for a new vision have also been heard in the other Nordic countries recently. The most obvious example is perhaps Finnish Sitra that explicitly describes the need for “an inspiring new promise about the future”. 

Considering the turbulent situation in the world in the last decade, it is perhaps not surprising that we find feelings of uncertainty. It is in fact something we could expect if we apply the long-term cyclical perspective of thinkers such as Neil Howe who describes how long cycles shape the characteristics of our societies and how the change from cycle to cycle typically results in crises. Viewed through the ‘wheel of seasons’ model developed by my colleagues Mats Lindgren and Jörgen Jedbratt, our current situation may represent a transition from winter to spring, during which crises will lead to new dominant paradigms. If reality were to follow the model, this should mean that we are slowly shifting towards an increased focus on long-term perspectives and finally also a rising belief in a positive future. 

Another sign of the uncertainty is the rising interest in scenario planning. This is a well-known pattern that goes back to the oil crisis of the 1970s when Shell’s scenario planning rose to fame and it is now perhaps the most familiar tool in the foresight toolbox. There is furthermore a general acceptance of scenario planning as a relevant tool for our time, but if we want to get broad participation and support for changes the map provided by the scenarios also needs to be accompanied by something more visionary.

The Nordic effect

So, if we are approaching a period of renewal maybe it is time to start thinking about how Nordic companies and other organisations could help bring this new future into being and shape it? How can we contribute to the creation of a new vision that can guide and speed up necessary changes so that we can balance sustainability and resilience, productivity and family life, and so on? Even though there exists a joint Nordic vision for 2030 that was adopted by the Nordic Council of Ministers in 2019 this is apparently not sufficient (and to be honest, how many of you have read it? I have, but that’s more or less required as part of my job). 

Maybe it is safe to say that it is time for a new Nordic vision? And maybe this time we should start the process as soon as possible ourselves in our own organisations so that we together can create small pieces of the great puzzle that would make up a new shared vision.

For boards, this means connecting the vision to investment priorities, capabilities and partnerships, and deciding how the organisation can contribute to a wider Nordic ambition.

Questions we need to answer in this process include:

  1. What future do we want to contribute to over the next ten to fifteen years?

  2. What can we influence? Which partners and capabilities will we need?

  3. What decisions do we need to make?

The last point may seem a bit obvious but as most of us know, foresight without action means nothing. There is in fact even a risk that foresight in some cases could become counterproductive and hinder necessary changes.

Decades ago, Kets de Vries and Miller described how some organisations become trapped in endless studies and analyses without taking action. Today, the abundance of foresight consultants and methods can give this tendency even more room to grow. An organisation may find itself contemplating a million possible futures, watching doors close one by one while trying to identify the perfect course of action. Foresight should help us choose a direction, prepare for different outcomes and move forward. A good analysis that leads to action is better than a perfect analysis that does not.

What's next

Let’s apply the tools from our foresight toolkits and start working! A new shared vision is needed and unless you take part in shaping it someone else will. So, let’s start small in our own organisations and launch processes to formulate our own visions and in this process also define our roles and purpose. This is often best done using collaborative methods – not just for the formulation of the vision but also to get people on board from the start because another thing that we need to remember is this. Scenarios and visions can give us a map of the future. But we still have to make the journey ourselves.

Johan Hammarlund

Collaborative Foresight Advisor, Kairos Future

Johan Hammarlund is a Senior Consultant at Kairos Future, a leading foresight and strategy consultancy that for more than 30 years has helped organisations anticipate change, explore future opportunities, and design strategies for long-term success. Johan specialises in collaborative foresight and democratic innovations and is active in professional networks across Sweden, the Nordic region and Europe.

Johan Hammarlund

Nordic Foresight

The Nordic Foresight Network is a network of foresight professionals advancing futures thinking across the Nordic region.

Nordic Foresight Network

Sources 

  1. Mats Lindgren - Winter is Coming or Springtime with Trump, 2016

  2. Kets de Vries and Miller - The Neurotic Organization, 1984

  3. Neil Howe - The Fourth Turning: Why American 'Crisis' May Last Until 2030, 2020

  4. Monteiro and Dal Borgo - Supporting decision making with strategic foresight, 2023

  5. Nordic prime ministers - Our Vision 2030, 2019

  6. Anna Solovjew-Wartiovaara - Sitra Megatrends Report, 2026

Columnists

Who will build the next shared vision?

Oct 6, 2026

Currently there appears to be a widespread feeling of rising uncertainty and a lack of a shared vision for the future. During Sweden’s recent election campaign commentators repeatedly asked where the larger visions for the country had gone. Amid promises of quick fixes and tactical positioning, the question of what society we should build seemed harder to answer. Similar examples with voices calling for a new vision have also been heard in the other Nordic countries recently. The most obvious example is perhaps Finnish Sitra that explicitly describes the need for “an inspiring new promise about the future”. 

Considering the turbulent situation in the world in the last decade, it is perhaps not surprising that we find feelings of uncertainty. It is in fact something we could expect if we apply the long-term cyclical perspective of thinkers such as Neil Howe who describes how long cycles shape the characteristics of our societies and how the change from cycle to cycle typically results in crises. Viewed through the ‘wheel of seasons’ model developed by my colleagues Mats Lindgren and Jörgen Jedbratt, our current situation may represent a transition from winter to spring, during which crises will lead to new dominant paradigms. If reality were to follow the model, this should mean that we are slowly shifting towards an increased focus on long-term perspectives and finally also a rising belief in a positive future. 

Another sign of the uncertainty is the rising interest in scenario planning. This is a well-known pattern that goes back to the oil crisis of the 1970s when Shell’s scenario planning rose to fame and it is now perhaps the most familiar tool in the foresight toolbox. There is furthermore a general acceptance of scenario planning as a relevant tool for our time, but if we want to get broad participation and support for changes the map provided by the scenarios also needs to be accompanied by something more visionary.

The Nordic effect

So, if we are approaching a period of renewal maybe it is time to start thinking about how Nordic companies and other organisations could help bring this new future into being and shape it? How can we contribute to the creation of a new vision that can guide and speed up necessary changes so that we can balance sustainability and resilience, productivity and family life, and so on? Even though there exists a joint Nordic vision for 2030 that was adopted by the Nordic Council of Ministers in 2019 this is apparently not sufficient (and to be honest, how many of you have read it? I have, but that’s more or less required as part of my job). 

Maybe it is safe to say that it is time for a new Nordic vision? And maybe this time we should start the process as soon as possible ourselves in our own organisations so that we together can create small pieces of the great puzzle that would make up a new shared vision.

For boards, this means connecting the vision to investment priorities, capabilities and partnerships, and deciding how the organisation can contribute to a wider Nordic ambition.

Questions we need to answer in this process include:

  1. What future do we want to contribute to over the next ten to fifteen years?

  2. What can we influence? Which partners and capabilities will we need?

  3. What decisions do we need to make?

The last point may seem a bit obvious but as most of us know, foresight without action means nothing. There is in fact even a risk that foresight in some cases could become counterproductive and hinder necessary changes.

Decades ago, Kets de Vries and Miller described how some organisations become trapped in endless studies and analyses without taking action. Today, the abundance of foresight consultants and methods can give this tendency even more room to grow. An organisation may find itself contemplating a million possible futures, watching doors close one by one while trying to identify the perfect course of action. Foresight should help us choose a direction, prepare for different outcomes and move forward. A good analysis that leads to action is better than a perfect analysis that does not.

What's next

Let’s apply the tools from our foresight toolkits and start working! A new shared vision is needed and unless you take part in shaping it someone else will. So, let’s start small in our own organisations and launch processes to formulate our own visions and in this process also define our roles and purpose. This is often best done using collaborative methods – not just for the formulation of the vision but also to get people on board from the start because another thing that we need to remember is this. Scenarios and visions can give us a map of the future. But we still have to make the journey ourselves.

Johan Hammarlund

Collaborative Foresight Advisor, Kairos Future

Johan Hammarlund is a Senior Consultant at Kairos Future, a leading foresight and strategy consultancy that for more than 30 years has helped organisations anticipate change, explore future opportunities, and design strategies for long-term success. Johan specialises in collaborative foresight and democratic innovations and is active in professional networks across Sweden, the Nordic region and Europe.

Johan Hammarlund

Nordic Foresight

The Nordic Foresight Network is a network of foresight professionals advancing futures thinking across the Nordic region.

Nordic Foresight Network

Sources 

  1. Mats Lindgren - Winter is Coming or Springtime with Trump, 2016

  2. Kets de Vries and Miller - The Neurotic Organization, 1984

  3. Neil Howe - The Fourth Turning: Why American 'Crisis' May Last Until 2030, 2020

  4. Monteiro and Dal Borgo - Supporting decision making with strategic foresight, 2023

  5. Nordic prime ministers - Our Vision 2030, 2019

  6. Anna Solovjew-Wartiovaara - Sitra Megatrends Report, 2026

Leadership Moves

SRV names Jarkko Salmenoja and Marko Palonen to its executive team in a four-area reorganisation

Oct 5, 2026

SRV Group has reorganised into four business areas from 1 October 2026 and added two members to its Corporate Executive Team. Jarkko Salmenoja becomes SVP, Data Centres, and Marko Palonen, most recently YIT's regional director for Northern Finland, becomes SVP, Northern Finland at the start of 2027.

Data centres move from a unit to a business area of their own

Until now, Data Centres sat inside the Business Premises, Helsinki Metropolitan Area business area. It now runs as a separate business area responsible for nationwide development, customer relationships and project delivery. Salmenoja has worked at SRV since August 2025 and previously held senior management roles at NCC, WSP Finland and YIT.

The pipeline explains the promotion. In March, SRV agreed to build a data centre in Lahti for Singapore-based DayOne, a contract expected to lift the order backlog by about 35% from the level in the fourth-quarter 2025 report. In December 2025, it started the EUR 54 million implementation phase of the LUMI AI Factory data centre in Kajaani with CSC. First-quarter 2026 order intake reached EUR 395.4 million, the highest of the decade, with DayOne named as a driver.

“Alongside our already strong contracting business, we seek growth in data centre construction, whose exceptionally large and rapidly growing market we have highlighted previously,” says Saku Sipola, President and CEO of SRV, in the press release.

Three regions now carry both residential and non-residential work, with an outside hire for the north

The Southern Finland, Western and Central Finland, and Northern Finland business areas are each responsible for both non-residential and residential construction in their markets. Jouni Forsman leads Southern Finland and Tero Karislahti leads Western and Central Finland. 

Palonen is the external addition. He served for an extended period as YIT's regional director for Northern Finland and before that at Lemminkäinen. Project development, leasing and transactions for non-residential work are combined into one unit under Jorma Seppä, while the roughly 100-person Building Services unit moves to Internal Services.

“Geographically, we are strengthening our local presence across Finland and seeking growth beyond our current operating areas in Northern Finland, on the West Coast and in the Uusimaa region in both contracting and residential construction,” says Sipola.

The new structure has to deliver nearly all of SRV's 2026 profit in the second half

SRV broke even at the operative level in the first half, on revenue of EUR 340.2 million. The company guides 2026 revenue above EUR 800 million and operative operating profit of EUR 10 to 20 million, backed by an order backlog of EUR 1,023.9 million at the end of June. That leaves at least EUR 460 million of revenue and the full profit target for the second half, the period the new business areas start in.

Salmenoja takes over a business area with two named projects already in delivery, in Lahti and Kajaani, and Palonen arrives in January to build a region SRV wants to grow. The full-year results in early 2027 will be the first test of whether four business areas change SRV's profit, not just its reporting lines. 

Leadership Moves

Elecster keeps leadership inside the board as Juuso Halonen becomes CEO

Oct 2, 2026

Elecster's board has named Deputy CEO Juuso Halonen as chief executive from 1 December 2026. Arto Kinnunen, CEO since 2017 and with the group for more than 30 years, leaves the role on 30 November and stays on as management advisor. On the same day, CFO Veronika Halonen becomes deputy CEO, eleven months after taking the finance role.

The March deputy appointment was the succession plan

On 5 March, Elecster appointed Halonen deputy CEO and a member of the management team from 30 March, reporting to Kinnunen. The stated remit was global sales and marketing and the development of management systems. Seven months later, the board has confirmed what that move signalled.

Halonen is an insider in every sense. He joined the group in 2011, has been CIO since 2019 and has sat on the board since 2024. At the time of the March appointment he held 32,705 Elecster shares. The company says Kinnunen's advisory role is meant to secure continuity through the year-end financial statement process, which places the first results under the new CEO in early 2027.

“Juuso knows Elecster, its business, personnel and international operating environment very well. The Board believes that his long experience with the company and the close work with Arto in recent months create a strong foundation for transferring the CEO's responsibility and further developing Elecster's operations,” says Jukka Halonen, Chairman of the Board, in the press release.

“I am pleased that the change of CEO can be implemented in a planned and controlled manner. I have worked closely with Juuso, and I can confidently transfer the responsibility of CEO to him,” says Arto Kinnunen.

He inherits a company whose order book has halved since March

The numbers Halonen takes over are thin. First-half 2026 revenue fell around 5.2% to EUR 15.8 million, and operating profit dropped to EUR 0.1 million from EUR 0.5 million a year earlier. The order backlog stood at EUR 4.8 million at the end of June, down from EUR 8.6 million at the end of March, as the Middle East conflict delayed customer investment decisions. A fire at the Kenyan subsidiary in Nairobi added around EUR 0.4 million in one-off costs.

The longer trend points the same way. Full-year 2025 revenue fell around 3.6% to EUR 32.7 million, and operating margin narrowed to 3.0% from 4.7%. The April AGM approved no dividend. The Russian packaging business, which the company says it will keep running for now, is the risk it flags most directly in the H1 report. Elecster still guides for revenue growth and improved earnings per share in 2026.

Halonen's own priorities match the gap. He names international sales and marketing, the service business and presence in core markets as the areas to develop, while keeping profitability as a cornerstone.

“Reliability, customer focus and profitability remain the cornerstones of our operations. At the same time, we must develop international sales and marketing, service business, our products and operating methods, and strengthen our presence and customer cooperation in our key market areas,” says Juuso Halonen in the press release.

Halonen family will hold both top executive roles and four of six board seats

The appointment concentrates leadership further. The board elected at the April 2026 AGM has six members: Aija Bärlund, Jarmo Halonen, Jukka Halonen as chair, Juuso Halonen, Veronika Halonen and Timo Kangas. From December, the CEO and deputy CEO will both come from that board.

“With her analytical and dynamic approach, Veronika Halonen has taken on the responsibilities of her current position well, and with this appointment as Deputy CEO, we are clarifying the Group's overall management structure,” says Jukka Halonen.

For a company of Elecster's size, an internal successor with seven months of supervised handover is a defensible choice. It also means the board chose continuity over an external search at a point when the business needs commercial renewal. Whether that trade pays off will show first in the order book, not in the governance chart.

Market Signals

Nightingale Health's USD 6.5 million brain health deal lands as it targets EUR 10 million in revenue

Oct 1, 2026

The Michael J. Fox Foundation will pay USD 6.5 million for Nightingale Health to analyse 60,000 UK Biobank samples for neurodegeneration markers. The company disclosed the agreement as inside information on 30 September. A day later, Nightingale published an annual report setting a revenue target of at least EUR 10 million for the current financial year.

The work will use Alamar Biosciences' NULISAseq™ Neuro 220 Panel, which is designed for neurodegeneration and other brain health conditions. At the Foundation's direction, the dataset goes to UK Biobank and opens to the wider research community in 2027. The aim is to find blood markers that change years before the symptoms of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's appear.

CEO and founder Teemu Suna said the company believes the deal will produce the world's largest brain health-focused proteomics study on a single research cohort.

The contract puts Nightingale's move into proteomics to work

The annual report says Nightingale expanded its offering into proteomics in response to growing interest in multiomics, strengthening its position in the research market. The step came through its November 2025 partnership with Alamar.

The report describes research as a separate business with its own customers and products. It is also where much of the evidence for Nightingale's healthcare business comes from, including measurements of all roughly 500,000 UK Biobank participants. The largest research agreements the report lists for the past financial year were with Aalborg University, at about EUR 2.4 million, and the Moli-sani study, at about EUR 0.7 million.

Revenue follows the samples, and the first read comes in March

Nightingale's revenue for the financial year ended June 2026 was EUR 5.50 million, up from EUR 4.69 million. That fell short of the more than 50% growth the company had targeted. In June, Nightingale warned that a EUR 2.4 million project announced in September 2025 had been delayed for reasons outside its control. As a result, about EUR 2 million of revenue moves into the current financial year. Suna called it "timing, not lost business".

The company recognises revenue over time as samples are analysed. It collects advance payments for most of its services, and the gap between payment and analysis is typically three to six months. The release gives no timeline for analysing the 60,000 samples.

The company expects its liquid funds of EUR 36.8 million to last until the end of the 2027/2028 financial year. The half-year report on 9 March 2027 will be the first chance to see how much of the delayed project and the Fox Foundation contract has turned into revenue towards the EUR 10 million target.

Commercial partnership

Vivicta

Insider interviews

A new item for the board agenda: seven in ten are investing, three in ten are in control

Sep 30, 2026

Digital sovereignty is moving off the IT compliance list and onto the board's risk agenda. Vivicta's Nordic Digital Sovereignty Survey 2026, published on 22 September, finds that seven in ten organisations expect to increase their sovereignty investment over the next twelve months, while fewer than three in ten are confident they control their critical data.

Not long ago, the CIO of a large Swedish company told Vivicta's CEO Satu Kiiskinen what his single highest priority was. It was knowing where the company's business-critical data actually sits. He knew a moment would come when the executive team and the board would ask him that question, and he wanted the answer ready.

The question stopped being technical

Digital sovereignty means an organisation's ability to retain control and decision-making authority over its critical data, systems and operational continuity, including when the operating environment changes.

The definition might sound like an IT matter. According to Kiiskinen, that is precisely the problem. In executive teams and boardrooms the subject is still treated too often as a compliance and technology question. Her own view is different: this is first and foremost about business continuity, risk management and the capacity to keep operating when conditions shift.

“It’s clear that sovereignty has become an increasingly important priority in the current geopolitical environment. Digital sovereignty has become a leadership priority linked to business continuity and risk management, and it’s no longer seen as just a compliance issue”
Satu Kiiskinen
Satu KiiskinenCEO, Vivicta

The gap is not in the budget

The survey, run by Vivicta in collaboration with the research company Kairos Future, drew 320 senior decision-makers and key advisers in Finland, Sweden and Norway between June and July 2026. All worked in organisations employing more than 500 people.

The findings describe a subject that is recognised but not yet governed:

  • 70 per cent expect sovereignty-related investment to increase over the next 12 months.

  • 46 per cent have a formal, explicit sovereignty strategy.

  • 29 per cent strongly believe they control their critical data to a sufficient standard.

This, Kiiskinen says, is the most interesting result in the dataset. The subject is recognised, it is discussed, and organisations are willing to put money behind it. The capability still does not match the ambition. A gap has opened between intent and execution.

For a board, that is a familiar situation in unfamiliar clothing: an investment decision is coming up on a matter that too often has no strategy, no named owner and no metric.

Finland invests most. Sweden is further ahead on strategy.

Seventy-four per cent of Finnish organisations plan to increase investment, more than in Norway (69 per cent) or Sweden (68 per cent). On strategy the order reverses: a formal sovereignty strategy exists at 53 per cent of Swedish organisations, 44 per cent of Finnish ones and 39 per cent of Norwegian ones.

On control of critical data, Finland leads the comparison at 35 per cent, with Sweden and Norway at 26 per cent. Finland is ahead of its Nordic peers, and still only one Finnish organisation in three strongly believes it has sufficient control of its critical data.

Sweden, Kiiskinen notes, put sovereignty on the table some time ago. The CIO in the opening example represents that stage: the question is no longer whether the subject matters, but whether the organisation can answer when asked.

The opportunity is competitiveness.

Kiiskinen does not frame the subject as a threat. She sees it primarily as an opportunity to strengthen an organisation's resilience and competitiveness, and, ultimately, shareholder value.

Artificial intelligence connects to this directly. When the AI conversation runs hot and business benefits are wanted quickly, control of data determines whether AI can be adopted in a governed way, with risks identified in advance rather than reconstructed afterwards. Twenty-seven per cent of respondents rank AI, data use and control of decision-making among their most important sovereignty priorities. Seventeen per cent see AI as a new obstacle to data control.

On the risk side, Kiiskinen names one above the others: excessive dependency on individual providers.

Respondents agree. Dependency on external service providers tops the entire list of obstacles at 28 per cent. Cost and the complexity of an organisation's own environment follow at 23 per cent each, vendor lock-in at 16 per cent, and the absence of a strategy, owner or governance model at 14 per cent.

Dependency is rarely anyone's decision. It accumulates. Each individual choice was defensible at the time, and the result is a structure no one designed. It becomes visible only when something has to change quickly.

Full control is not the goal

Kiiskinen is careful not to overstate what the survey shows.

Complete sovereignty across every system is neither realistic nor the point, Kiiskinen says. What matters is distinguishing what is business-critical from what is not. The organisations that find a sensible balance are the ones that find resilience when conditions change

The data supports her. Only 8 per cent of respondents consider standard or global cloud sufficient for all critical workloads, and exactly the same share require full national sovereignty with elevated security. Everyone else sits somewhere in between. Seventeen per cent have not assessed the question at all.

“Ultimately, sovereignty is about freedom of action: the ability to remain in control when technology, suppliers or circumstances change. Organisations that find the right balance will be better positioned to innovate, grow and manage risk simultaneously”
Satu Kiiskinen
Satu KiiskinenCEO, Vivicta

What the board should ask

Kiiskinen does not present this as an easy topic for a board. The natural route onto the agenda, she says, runs through the audit committee, as part of risk management and business continuity. That does not mean it stays there. The whole board needs to take an interest.

Five questions a board can put to management at its next meeting:

  1. Do we share a view of which data is business-critical to us?

  2. Which systems are business-critical, and do we understand the difference between the two?

  3. Where does our business-critical data actually reside, and how is it governed?

  4. Who has access to it?

  5. To what extent are our data, systems and decision-making genuinely under our own control, and which part of our preparedness is an assumption rather than something tested?

None of these requires technical expertise to ask. On the evidence of this survey, many organisations would struggle to answer them.

Which leaves one question on the table, and it belongs to the board rather than to IT: are boards challenging management hard enough, before the next disruption reveals the real state of their readiness?

Market Signals

Finnish consumers see the national recovery, but not yet in their own finances

Sep 29, 2026

Consumer confidence in Finland slipped in September, ending a three-month climb from April's low. Beneath the headline figure, a sharper pattern is forming. Households now rate Finland's prospects at their long-term average, while their view of their own past year remains well below pre-2022 levels, and the lowest earners are still losing purchasing power.

The consumer confidence indicator stood at 4.9 below zero in September, down from 3.0 below zero in August. August had been the strongest reading since February 2022. The long-term average since 1995 is 2.9 below zero. The indicator has now been below zero for 55 consecutive months, every month since March 2022. 

The rebound itself was fast. In April the indicator sat at 12.5 below zero, and by August it had recovered 9.5 points. September's dip is small, and one month does not make a reversal. What matters more is which parts of the survey carried the recovery, and which did not.

Consumer confidence indicator (CCI, A1)

2016M09–2026M09

Balance figure
-20-10010202017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Source: Statistics Finland, consumer confidence
Updated: 28/09/2026

The national outlook has recovered 18 points since April, the household view far less

Most of the improvement since April's low has come from how consumers see Finland. The national outlook accounts for about 60 per cent of the indicator's 7.6-point rise. Consumers' view of their own past year has moved far less.

Expectations for Finland's economy over the next 12 months improved from a balance of 23.2 below zero in April to 4.7 below zero in September, which is on its long-term average level. Between March 2022 and August 2026, the same measure averaged 16.9 below zero.

Households' assessment of their own finances tells a different story. The balance for own economy now stood at 1.9 below zero in September, against an average of 4.9 above zero in the five and a half years before March 2022. Expectations for one's own economy in 12 months fell to 5.8 from 8.1 in August, short of the pre-2022 average of 9.8. Twenty-eight per cent of consumers said their finances were worse than a year earlier, while 25 per cent said better.

Consumers' views concerning their own and Finland's economy

2016M09–2026M09

Balance figure
-40-20020402017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Source: Statistics Finland, consumer confidence
Updated: 28/09/2026

The gap follows income, not prices

Labour Institute for Economic Research Labore estimates that purchasing power in the bottom income decile will decline by 3.5 per cent this year, while the top decile gains 2.2 per cent. Between 2023 and 2026, the difference in purchasing power growth between the two groups will exceed 16 percentage points, with renters and single parents facing the weakest outlook. Senior researcher Milla Nyyssölä attributes the split to "different income trajectories" rather than prices.

Labore describes this as unusual by historical standards. Even in the growth years after Finland's 1990s recession, when income growth varied widely between groups, purchasing power in the lowest decile did not fall.

The confidence survey shows the same fault line. Upper-level salaried employees posted a confidence reading of 1.1 above zero in September, while the unemployed stood at 13.1 below zero and pensioners at 11.5 below zero. Greater Helsinki recorded 2.4 below zero and Eastern Finland 10.7 below zero. Women's reading of 7.4 below zero remained well under men's 2.4 below zero.

Job security is part of the explanation. Among employed consumers, 27 per cent felt their personal risk of unemployment or lay-off had increased, and only 5 per cent felt it had lessened (Statistics Finland). Price pressure has not eased either: consumers estimated inflation at 4.9 per cent over the past year and expect 4.1 per cent over the next.

Durable spending sentiment has been negative for 55 months, yet car and loan plans run above usual

The balance for whether now is a good time to buy durable goods stood at 13.0 below zero in September. It has been below zero every month since March 2022, after averaging 19.2 above zero in the preceding five and a half years. Only 15 per cent of consumers considered the time favourable for expensive purchases, and 37 per cent planned to cut spending on durables over the next year, against 13 per cent planning to increase it.

The exception is big-ticket purchases. Seventeen per cent of consumers were definitely or possibly planning to buy a car within 12 months, and 19 per cent planned to take out a loan, both clearly more than usual according to Statistics Finland . The published figures do not show which households hold those plans. One reading fits Labore's data: the top income decile is gaining purchasing power this year, and those households are best placed to finance a car. The other is that some borrowing plans reflect strain rather than confidence. The data cannot yet separate the two. 

Consumers' intentions to spend money on durable goods

2016M09–2026M09

Balance figure
-40-20020402017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Source: Statistics Finland, consumer confidence
Updated: 28/09/2026

For consumer-facing companies on Nasdaq Helsinki, that uncertainty is itself the finding. September's survey describes a recovery in expectations, not yet in household income, and it is arriving at different speeds for different customers. The signal to watch is whether consumers' view of their own past year starts to follow the national outlook. Until it does, plans built on the Finnish average will be calibrated to sentiment rather than spending power.

Leadership Moves

Tiina Määttä takes LapWall's CFO and legal role as order backlog hits a record high

Sep 28, 2026

LapWall Corporation has named Tiina Määttä as Chief Financial Officer and Legal Officer, one day after announcing the departure of CFO Tuomo Riihonen. Määttä joins the management team on 1 October 2026. She takes over finance at the point where the company's full-year guidance depends on a sharper second half and on a factory ramp-up that has already slipped once.

Riihonen's employment ended on 24 September, the day his exit was announced, with CEO Jarmo Pekkarinen covering the CFO duties in the interim. No reason was given. Seven weeks earlier, Riihonen presented the half-year results alongside Pekkarinen. 

The first half delivered growth, but the guidance needs a margin step-up

LapWall's January to June revenue rose 24.0% to EUR 23.3 million, and EBITA grew 80.1% to EUR 2.0 million. The EBITA margin reached 8.6%, against 5.9% a year earlier. Between quarters, however, the margin moved the other way, falling from 9.5% in the first quarter to 7.9% in the second, although both were ahead of the prior year 

The company kept its guidance for 2026 of EUR 49 to 54 million in revenue and EUR 4.8 to 5.8 million in EBITA. 

Order backlog gives visibility, the Pyhännä factory sets the pace

Demand is not the constraint. The order backlog reached EUR 25.4 million at the end of June, the highest in the company's history, and the offer pipeline stood at nearly EUR 60 million. Pekkarinen pointed to data centre construction as a growing segment, including a supply agreement for XTX Markets' data centre project in Kajaani.

Capacity is the variable. The new Pyhännä factory, LapWall's largest investment to date, was about 95% complete on a cost basis at the end of June. In April, the aim was single-shift production across the whole factory during 2026. By August, the target to meet the investment's production goals had moved to the final quarter of the year, with the company noting that ramp-up remained behind its original schedule. Headcount rose from 127 to 143 over the year to June.

The redesigned role reflects a company scaling towards 2030

LapWall targets revenue of around EUR 100 million and an EBITA margin of 15 to 20% by the end of 2030. The new CFO mandate is built for that trajectory.

"The next phase of LapWall's growth strategy will bring new demands on management. The role of CFO combines financial management, forecasting and knowledge-based management, risk management and, as an important part, legal support for business operations. Tiina's extensive experience in financial, legal and business management, as well as international project business, strengthens the expertise of our management team in these areas. I warmly welcome Tiina to LapWall," says CEO Jarmo Pekkarinen.

Määttä's record fits that brief. She has held finance and legal advisory roles at Talenom and Greenstep, and served as CEO of Kymsol Group and COO of Kymsol, supporting domestic and international project businesses. For a supplier whose revenue is built on project contracts and whose net gearing stood at 60.0% in June, legal oversight of commercial terms sits close to margin protection.

"LapWall has boldly built the foundation for its growth strategy. I look forward to working with the staff, customers and stakeholders. It is great to be able to join a talented group to build LapWall's growth and future together," says Tiina Määttä.

Her first reporting cycle will show how much of the backlog the new factory can convert.

Leadership Moves

Aspocomp names Ville Raatikainen chief engineering and technology officer as new Oulu capacity arrives in 2027

Sep 25, 2026

Ville Raatikainen, a manufacturing engineering director at iLOQ with an R&D and product management background at Nokia, joins the Management Team on January 1, 2027. He is the second outside hire to the team since July, and he starts in the year the PCB maker commissions its expanded Oulu plant.

Aspocomp has appointed Ville Raatikainen (born 1984), M.Sc. (Eng.), as Chief Engineering and Technology Officer and a member of the Management Team from January 1, 2027. He currently serves as Director, Product Lifecycle and Manufacturing Engineering at iLOQ Oy and previously held R&D and product management roles at Nokia. Chief Technology Officer Mitri Mattila will stay with the company and report to Raatikainen. Mattila has worked at Aspocomp since 1997 and sat on the Management Team since 2018. 

Chief executive Manu Skyttä's endorsement speaks to production as much as to technology:

Ville has a strong track record in managing complex technical environments, improving production performance, and developing high-quality, cost-effective design operations. He has a strong background in both global listed companies like Nokia and fast-growing technology companies like iLOQ, and I am pleased to welcome him to Aspocomp. 

Six of seven Management Team members will have joined since 2024

Raatikainen follows Ilkka Lohi, who became Quality Director on September 2, 2026 in a role the company raised to Management Team level. Listeds data shows how far the renewal runs. Skyttä became chief executive in 2024 after serving as EVP, Operations at Patria, and Pekka Holopainen joined the team as operations chief the same year. Hanna-Leena Keskitalo and Terhi Launis followed in 2025, with Launis taking over finance on September, 2025. When the January 2027 line-up takes effect, Antti Ojala, a member since 2013, will be the only one whose seat predates 2024.

This is a team assembled for the expansion, not inherited from the loss years. The board supplies the sector memory. Chairman Ville Vuori is a former Incap chief executive, and director Anssi Korhonen was CTO of VTI Technologies.

The hire lands as Oulu moves from construction to yield

The Oulu program is worth more than EUR 10 million and aims to lift throughput capacity by up to 50%. Demand had already outrun the plant. At the strategy launch in November 2025, Skyttä said: “The capacity of the Oulu plant has been fully utilized throughout 2025, and demand has already exceeded our capacity.The growth in demand in our largest customer segments appears likely to continue over the next 5–10 years.” The building extension was finished on schedule and within budget, and new capacity is to be commissioned in phases throughout 2027. By July the automated warehouse was running, factory acceptance tests for new production lines had begun, and management said the second half would center on production quality and yield.

The risks are operational. Spare-parts shortages after an equipment manufacturer's bankruptcy slowed deliveries in the first quarter. Delivery times for laminates, fiberglass, resins and copper foil are lengthening and prices are rising, and the company warns that the installations may temporarily disrupt production. Those are manufacturing engineering problems, and that is the experience Raatikainen brings from iLOQ.

A record order book still has to turn into margin

Period

Net sales, EUR m

Operating result, EUR m

Orders received, EUR m

Order book, EUR m

Equity ratio

FY 2025 

38.2 (27.6)

0.9 (-4.0)

39.3 (37.0)

21.1 (19.9)

65.0%

Q1 2026 

9.7 (10.3)

0.2 (0.8)

12.2 (11.4)

23.5 (21.0)

63.9%

Q2 2026 

10.6 (10.1)

0.4 (0.2)

12.9 (8.8)

25.9 (19.8)

60.9%

H1 2026 

20.3 (20.4)

0.6 (1.0)

25.2 (20.3)

25.9 (19.8)

60.9%

The order book reached a record EUR 25.9 million at the end of June, with parts stretching to late 2027. Semiconductor customers placed 38% of second-quarter orders and defense customers 25%, while the five largest customers' share of net sales fell to 58% (75%). Profit has lagged, weighed down until the second quarter by low-margin orders agreed in 2024. Skyttä's position is unambiguous: “We expect profitability to improve in the second half of the year.”

Skyttä took that defense case to investors on September 21, 2026, when Aspocomp pitched at the Listeds Investor Event – Defence alongside Gofore, Kesla, Savox Communications and Betolar, with three more defense and dual-use companies presenting in a separate growth round. Helene Auramo, CEO of Listeds Oy opened the evening with the question “Can Europe build what it has ordered?” Skyttä gave his reply in a LinkedIn post afterward: “My answer, in short: not without PCBs.” In the same post he put Europe's share of global PCB production at 2.2% and said the number of European PCB makers has fallen from 593 to 168 since 2000. Aspocomp's order book already reflects that shortage, and its capacity to meet it is what the Oulu expansion will test. 

Aspocomp is aiming for EUR 100 million in sales and a double-digit margin

The 2026 to 2030 strategy targets more than EUR 100 million in net sales in the long term and an EBIT margin exceeding 10% in the midterm, with the aim of ranking among the top three PCB manufacturers and suppliers in selected European segments. Oulu alone will not deliver that. The company states that reaching the sales target depends on expanding its production network, also through M&A, alongside a wider partner network outside China. The expansion of Oulu plant  is funded by a directed share issue of about EUR 3.2 million and EUR 5.5 million in long-term loans, plus about EUR 1.75 million from the EU Just Transition Fund. For 2026, Aspocomp guides for higher net sales and a better operating result than the EUR 38.2 million and EUR 0.9 million of 2025.

Market Signals

Sensofusion seeks a €1.3 billion Helsinki listing with its founder keeping control

Sep 24, 2026

Drone countermeasures company Sensofusion plans to list on Nasdaq Helsinki in October at a pre-money valuation of up to €1.3 billion. That would make it the first growth company to join the Helsinki exchange valued above €1 billion. The company aims to raise about €300 million in new shares, and four Finnish institutions have already committed €170 million of that.

The anchor investors are Elo, Ilmarinen, Varma and funds managed by OP Fund Management . The offering will include a public offering in Finland and an institutional offering in Finland and internationally, including in the US. The majority shareholder, Haave Oy, and some other shareholders will also sell existing shares.

A 60.8% operating margin carries the valuation

Sensofusion's revenue rose almost 90% in 2025 to €35 million, with profit of more than €23 million. In the first half of 2026, revenue grew another 122%. In the 12 months to the end of June 2026, the operating margin was 60.8%. Revenue grew at an average annual rate of 91.1% between the 2024 financial year and that 12-month period. Earlier this decade, annual revenue was around €700,000.

The company's main product, Airfence, detects hostile drones and can disable them by radio jamming. Customers include Ukraine, NASA, the Finnish Defence Forces and the Finnish Border Guard. "A large number of our customers are operational in some way, involved in war," said founder and CEO Tuomas Rasila.

The company says most of its revenue already comes from outside conflict zones. Rasila expects demand to grow whether or not the war in Ukraine continues, pointing to NATO members' commitment to spend 3.5 to 5% of GDP on defence. "There is nothing we hope for more than the end of war," he said. Chairman Timo Ahopelto put the market's annual growth at about 30%. "By 2030, the market will increase approximately fivefold," he said.

The proceeds will fund research and development in software, detection and countermeasure technologies, artificial intelligence and satellite capabilities. They will also pay for more production and testing capacity and strengthen the balance sheet.

Rasila will remain the controlling owner

Rasila owns up to 82% of the company, according to Helsingin Sanomat. He says the listing is not an exit. "I want Sensofusion to grow bigger than its founder. At the same time, I intend to continue as CEO," he said. He also plans to sell only a small part of his holding: "I am selling maybe about one percent of my own share and I am committing to not selling the 99 percent"

Suppose the issue raises the full €300 million at the maximum valuation. The dividend policy puts reinvestment first, and any future payouts will depend on the company's financing needs for growth. New shareholders are paying for growth, not for influence. The board and management already include familiar names: Ahopelto as chairman, and Mikko Hyppönen, formerly of F-Secure, as research director.

Market Signals

UPM and Sappi's paper venture heads for an EU veto as UPM's WISA demerger nears completion

Sep 23, 2026

The European Commission is set to block the €1.42 billion graphic paper joint venture between UPM and Sappi after the two companies declined to offer concessions, according to people familiar with the matter. The report lands six weeks before UPM's other portfolio exit, the demerger of its plywood business into WISA Group, is due to complete.

The companies also failed to persuade regulators at a closed-door hearing earlier that week, where they argued the deal would make the industry more sustainable and resilient. Selling assets to win approval is not considered an option because buyers are hard to find. The Commission has until 11 November to decide. UPM and Sappi declined to comment.

UPM planned to move about 30% of its sales out of the group

The two transactions together cover Communication Papers, with €2,493 million in 2025 sales, and Plywood, with €409 million. Against group sales of €9,656 million, that is roughly 30% of UPM's revenue, according to Listeds calculations based on the company figures.

The plywood exit is close to done. UPM's extraordinary general meeting approved the WISA Group demerger on 31 August 2026 and elected its board, chaired by Tapio Korpeinen. Completion is expected on or about 31 October, with trading on Nasdaq Helsinki from 2 November. Shareholders receive one WISA share for each UPM share, and the Finnish Tax Administration has ruled the demerger tax-neutral.


Plywood → WISA Group

Communication Papers → joint venture with Sappi

2025 sales

€409 million

€2,493 million

Structure

Demerger, one WISA share per UPM share

50/50 joint venture, €475 million cash to UPM at closing

Approvals

Shareholders, tax ruling and prospectus: all cleared

Merger control in the EU, the US and China

Next date

Completion on or about 31 October, trading from 2 November

EU decision due by 11 November

Chief executive

Tuija Suur-Hamari

Gunnar Eberhardt (conditional)

Status

On track

EU veto expected, according to Reuters

The difference between the two is who has the final say. The demerger needed UPM's own shareholders, a tax ruling and a prospectus approval, and it has cleared all three. The joint venture needs merger control approval from the European Commission and from authorities in the US and China. WISA starts trading on 2 November, and the Commission must decide by 11 November. Within those nine days, UPM will learn whether it is exiting one business or two.

Regulatory concerns grew while the deal moved forward on schedule

UPM and Sappi signed a non-binding letter of intent on 4 December 2025. The plan was a non-listed 50/50 joint venture combining Sappi's European graphic paper business with UPM Communication Papers in Europe, the UK and the US. The Commission opened a Phase II investigation on 28 April 2026. UPM called this a normal step when initial concerns have not been resolved 

One month later, on 28 May, the parties signed the definitive agreement. They also secured €600 million of external financing and a €100 million revolving credit facility, both underwritten by Citi and Nordea. 

In August the Commission sent a statement of objections. It said the venture could gain enough market power to raise prices and lower quality in coated mechanical and coated wood-free paper, the grades used for magazines, books and promotional print. "The Commission is currently unconvinced that integrating the relevant activities in the joint venture would bring enough benefits, in terms of cost savings or environmental or resilience improvements, to offset the potential harm," it said.

UPM said it was confident it could respond fully to the concerns, and that it "remains convinced that the planned joint venture is a necessary step to secure reliable supply continuity for graphic paper customers in Europe". Sappi called the objections a "standard" step and said it expected a positive outcome by the end of the year. Three weeks later, the companies declined to offer concessions.

Both of UPM's exits were staffed from inside the parent companies

The companies kept building the organisation after the objections arrived. In early September, Gunnar Eberhardt was conditionally nominated as CEO and Stephen Blyth as CFO. On 14 September four more nominations followed: Jan Gustafsson for human resources, Marco Eikelenboom for sales and marketing, Antti Hermonen for operations, and Jan-Sander van Tuijl for supply chain 

Of the five nominees whose current roles were disclosed, three come from Sappi Europe and two from UPM Communication Papers. Eikelenboom, currently CEO of Sappi Europe, commented in December that “To remain competitive and sustainable in the long term, consolidation is needed. Consolidation will contribute to a more robust and resilient European graphic paper industry, safeguarding security of domestic supply for the printing sector.” All the nominations depend on regulatory approval, and the current leaders stay in their roles until closing. If the veto happens, the whole team stays where it is.

The same pattern holds at WISA, where Tuija Suur-Hamari moves from running UPM Plywood to chief executive of the new listed company. Listeds has covered the leadership side of this year's Helsinki demergers in Two new listed CEOs, no search, no external hire. The difference is that Suur-Hamari's appointment is certain, while the joint venture team's depends on Brussels.

A veto would leave both parents holding the exposure they tried to exit

For UPM, the deal was an exit from a declining market. After closing, UPM would have had no direct sales exposure to graphic paper in Europe or North America. At closing it would have received €475 million in cash and €98 million in shareholder loan receivables, and €411 million of net pension and other liabilities would have moved to the joint venture.

The business UPM would keep is not weak on returns. In 2025, Communication Papers generated a comparable EBITDA margin of 9.7%, against 14.0% for the rest of the group. Its comparable return on capital employed, however, was 17.8%, compared with 5.8% for the rest of UPM. The deal was about margin mix and market direction, not a loss-making unit. With WISA gone and Communication Papers still in the group, graphic paper would make up a larger share of the UPM that remains.

Sappi's goals were to reduce its direct graphic paper volume exposure to below 20% and to pay down debt. At closing it would have received €90 million in cash.

Decisions on Finnish capacity would go back to each parent

Four of the mills in the deal are in Finland: Sappi's Kirkniemi mill and UPM's Rauma, Kymi and Jämsänkoski paper line 6. The joint venture planned to shift production to its most efficient machines and targeted about €100 million in annual synergies. If the deal is blocked, each company would have to make those capacity decisions on its own. The same shortage of buyers that ruled out remedies would also make any standalone sale harder.

The Reuters report relies on unnamed sources, and the Commission has not ruled. What to watch before 11 November is whether the companies change their position on concessions.