Around forty of those names belong to a single company each. Citycon has the only cyber committee on the exchange, and last year it did not meet.

Citycon's board has a Cyber Committee. It is the only one on Nasdaq Helsinki. The company's own governance disclosure records that in 2025, the Cyber Committee did not convene. Its Audit and Governance Committee met four times that year. Its Nomination and Remuneration Committee met seven.

A cyber committee is a defensible answer to a real exposure for a listed property owner. What stands out is that no other Helsinki-listed board has formalised the same risk in the same way, or in many cases at all.

35+ committee names belong to a single company each

Citycon is not the only board with a committee nobody else has. Raisio established an M&A Committee at its 2025 annual general meeting, chaired by board chair Arto Tiitinen. Orion runs an R&D Committee, chaired by Hilpi Rautelin, the only one of its kind in the Finnish listed market. Revenio has an Integration Committee. GRK Infra has a Tender and Project Committee. HKFoods runs a Working Committee and a Special Committee. Fortum has folded technology and investment into one body, and YIT has done the same with investment and projects.

Audit and remuneration still do almost all of the work

Across 184 Helsinki-listed companies, 127 have at least one board committee. Fifty-seven have none. Those 127 boards run 270 committees between them.

The functions concentrate tightly. Audit appears in 122 committee mandates, remuneration in 71, and people, personnel or human resources in 59. Nomination or governance appears in 26, sustainability in 14, risk in 13.

Another 11 committees use "Compensation" instead of remuneration, so a body explicitly charged with pay appears in 82 of the 270 — and that still excludes the 17 Personnel, People and Human Resources committees holding the same mandate without naming pay.

The names do not concentrate at all. After normalising for capitalisation and ampersands, those 270 committees carry 60 distinct labels, and 38 of them are used by exactly one company.

Most of that variety is cosmetic. People and Sustainability. Sustainability and Personnel. Sustainability and HR. Remuneration and HR. HR and Compensation. People and Compensation. Human Resources and Remuneration. Seven labels, one mandate.

The Code mandates the function, not the label

None of this is a compliance failure. The Finnish Corporate Governance Code 2026 is explicit: "Companies do not have an obligation under the Corporate Governance Code to establish committees or a shareholders' nomination board. As the establishment of the committees is not obligatory, the lack of committees is not deemed to be a departure from the code and therefore there is no need to report or explain it."

The Code also lets boards merge mandates, stating that "the board of directors may combine duties of the committees referred to in the Corporate Governance Code into a single committee or also establish other permanent or temporary committees, combine the duties assigned to different committees, or decide that a certain matter be prepared by the entire board of directors ". It requires only that the statutory audit duties sit somewhere, whether in a dedicated audit committee, in another committee, or with the board as a whole.

Committee data does not aggregate across Helsinki

For a board, a specialist committee is a statement about where directors spend their hours. Orion formalising research and development, and Nokia formalising both technology and strategy, tell a reader something that the committee list in an annual report otherwise flattens.

For anyone reading across the market, the absence of a shared vocabulary is the cost. Screening Nasdaq Helsinki for boards with a technology committee returns no reliable answer. Nokia, Kalmar, Kempower and Revenio call it Technology. Fortum calls it Technology and Investment. Sotkamo Silver calls it Technical. Citycon has carved cyber out on its own. (That reading is interpretation. It is a comparability problem for investors and index work, not a governance failing at any individual company.)

Worth watching is whether specialist committees spread beyond the handful of boards that run them. Technology-type committees number seven across the market. Cyber committees number one, and last year it did not meet.

|

|

Insights

Helsinki's boards run 270 committees under 60 different names

Helsinki's boards run 270 committees under 60 different names

·

5 min read

Around forty of those names belong to a single company each. Citycon has the only cyber committee on the exchange, and last year it did not meet.

Citycon's board has a Cyber Committee. It is the only one on Nasdaq Helsinki. The company's own governance disclosure records that in 2025, the Cyber Committee did not convene. Its Audit and Governance Committee met four times that year. Its Nomination and Remuneration Committee met seven.

A cyber committee is a defensible answer to a real exposure for a listed property owner. What stands out is that no other Helsinki-listed board has formalised the same risk in the same way, or in many cases at all.

35+ committee names belong to a single company each

Citycon is not the only board with a committee nobody else has. Raisio established an M&A Committee at its 2025 annual general meeting, chaired by board chair Arto Tiitinen. Orion runs an R&D Committee, chaired by Hilpi Rautelin, the only one of its kind in the Finnish listed market. Revenio has an Integration Committee. GRK Infra has a Tender and Project Committee. HKFoods runs a Working Committee and a Special Committee. Fortum has folded technology and investment into one body, and YIT has done the same with investment and projects.

Audit and remuneration still do almost all of the work

Across 184 Helsinki-listed companies, 127 have at least one board committee. Fifty-seven have none. Those 127 boards run 270 committees between them.

The functions concentrate tightly. Audit appears in 122 committee mandates, remuneration in 71, and people, personnel or human resources in 59. Nomination or governance appears in 26, sustainability in 14, risk in 13.

Another 11 committees use "Compensation" instead of remuneration, so a body explicitly charged with pay appears in 82 of the 270 — and that still excludes the 17 Personnel, People and Human Resources committees holding the same mandate without naming pay.

The names do not concentrate at all. After normalising for capitalisation and ampersands, those 270 committees carry 60 distinct labels, and 38 of them are used by exactly one company.

Most of that variety is cosmetic. People and Sustainability. Sustainability and Personnel. Sustainability and HR. Remuneration and HR. HR and Compensation. People and Compensation. Human Resources and Remuneration. Seven labels, one mandate.

Stay sharp on Finnish market in just two minutes a day.

The previous day's top signals across Finnish-listed companies: results, deals, board and leadership moves. Fast, factual, no noise.

Delivered from Monday to Friday, first thing.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy

Stay sharp on Finnish market in just two minutes a day.

The previous day's top signals across Finnish-listed companies: results, deals, board and leadership moves. Fast, factual, no noise.

Delivered from Monday to Friday, first thing.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy

The Code mandates the function, not the label

None of this is a compliance failure. The Finnish Corporate Governance Code 2026 is explicit: "Companies do not have an obligation under the Corporate Governance Code to establish committees or a shareholders' nomination board. As the establishment of the committees is not obligatory, the lack of committees is not deemed to be a departure from the code and therefore there is no need to report or explain it."

The Code also lets boards merge mandates, stating that "the board of directors may combine duties of the committees referred to in the Corporate Governance Code into a single committee or also establish other permanent or temporary committees, combine the duties assigned to different committees, or decide that a certain matter be prepared by the entire board of directors ". It requires only that the statutory audit duties sit somewhere, whether in a dedicated audit committee, in another committee, or with the board as a whole.

Committee data does not aggregate across Helsinki

For a board, a specialist committee is a statement about where directors spend their hours. Orion formalising research and development, and Nokia formalising both technology and strategy, tell a reader something that the committee list in an annual report otherwise flattens.

For anyone reading across the market, the absence of a shared vocabulary is the cost. Screening Nasdaq Helsinki for boards with a technology committee returns no reliable answer. Nokia, Kalmar, Kempower and Revenio call it Technology. Fortum calls it Technology and Investment. Sotkamo Silver calls it Technical. Citycon has carved cyber out on its own. (That reading is interpretation. It is a comparability problem for investors and index work, not a governance failing at any individual company.)

Worth watching is whether specialist committees spread beyond the handful of boards that run them. Technology-type committees number seven across the market. Cyber committees number one, and last year it did not meet.

Nordic Listed Leaders Board Programme

Learn board work from
the people who do it.

Harvard cases, coaching and open dialogue with people who sit on and work with boards of Finnish publicly listed companies.

Next cohort

19 November 2026

Then January, April, August and October 2027

Nordic Listed Leaders Board Programme

Learn board work from
the people who do it.

Harvard cases, coaching and open dialogue with people who sit on and work with boards of Finnish publicly listed companies.

Next cohort

19 November 2026

Then January, April, August and October 2027

Topics

# Topics

Authors

Founder and ceo

Helene Auramo is a co-founder of Listeds and Nordic Listed Leaders. She has previously co-founded Slush, Indiedays, Zipipop, and Okimo Clinic, building ventures at the intersection of media, technology, and community. She holds board positions at the Finnish Business School Graduates (Suomen Ekonomit) and Finnvera, and serves as Chair of the Investment Committee at the Finnish Business School Graduates. Helene is also a columnist for Talouselämä, Finland’s leading business magazine, and Aamulehti, one of the country’s largest newspapers. Her work focuses on leadership, growth, and the structures that shape decision-making in Nordic companies. She was awarded Future Board Member of the Year in 2022 by Future Board.

Founder and ceo

Helene Auramo is a co-founder of Listeds and Nordic Listed Leaders. She has previously co-founded Slush, Indiedays, Zipipop, and Okimo Clinic, building ventures at the intersection of media, technology, and community. She holds board positions at the Finnish Business School Graduates (Suomen Ekonomit) and Finnvera, and serves as Chair of the Investment Committee at the Finnish Business School Graduates. Helene is also a columnist for Talouselämä, Finland’s leading business magazine, and Aamulehti, one of the country’s largest newspapers. Her work focuses on leadership, growth, and the structures that shape decision-making in Nordic companies. She was awarded Future Board Member of the Year in 2022 by Future Board.

Devdatta Temgire is a data and business analyst at Listeds. He contributes research, data analysis, and pattern detection to the publication’s coverage of Nordic-listed companies, with a focus on board composition, leadership transitions, and financials. He holds an honors degree in artificial intelligence and data science alongside a bachelor’s in computer engineering, and previously worked at KPMG.

Devdatta Temgire is a data and business analyst at Listeds. He contributes research, data analysis, and pattern detection to the publication’s coverage of Nordic-listed companies, with a focus on board composition, leadership transitions, and financials. He holds an honors degree in artificial intelligence and data science alongside a bachelor’s in computer engineering, and previously worked at KPMG.

Authors

Founder and ceo

Helene Auramo is a co-founder of Listeds and Nordic Listed Leaders. She has previously co-founded Slush, Indiedays, Zipipop, and Okimo Clinic, building ventures at the intersection of media, technology, and community. She holds board positions at the Finnish Business School Graduates (Suomen Ekonomit) and Finnvera, and serves as Chair of the Investment Committee at the Finnish Business School Graduates. Helene is also a columnist for Talouselämä, Finland’s leading business magazine, and Aamulehti, one of the country’s largest newspapers. Her work focuses on leadership, growth, and the structures that shape decision-making in Nordic companies. She was awarded Future Board Member of the Year in 2022 by Future Board.

Devdatta Temgire is a data and business analyst at Listeds. He contributes research, data analysis, and pattern detection to the publication’s coverage of Nordic-listed companies, with a focus on board composition, leadership transitions, and financials. He holds an honors degree in artificial intelligence and data science alongside a bachelor’s in computer engineering, and previously worked at KPMG.

All Listeds newsletters (bundle)

One sign-up, the full picture.

Get every Listeds newsletter: the daily signal drumbeat, the weekly Pulse briefing, the monthly Best of the Month, the CEO letter, and the Weekend read.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy

All Listeds newsletters (bundle)

One sign-up, the full picture.

Get every Listeds newsletter: the daily signal drumbeat, the weekly Pulse briefing, the monthly Best of the Month, the CEO letter, and the Weekend read.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy

Latest signalsLive feed
Moves trackerLive feed

Nordic Listed Leaders Board Programme

Learn board work from
the people who do it.

Harvard cases, coaching and open dialogue with people who sit on and work with boards of Finnish publicly listed companies.

Next cohort

19 November 2026

Then January, April, August and October 2027

Latest on Listeds

Executive Intelligence

Nordea catches Nokia at the top of Helsinki board pay

Nordea raised its chair fee by 10% this spring, to €440,000 a year. Its chair is now paid exactly as much as Nokia's, and both earn far more than the chair of any other Helsinki large cap.

A year ago Nordea paid its chair €400,000, the second-highest fee in the segment. This year's annual general meeting added €40,000. Nokia kept its chair fee unchanged at €440,000.

The gap to the rest is wide. The third-highest chair fee is Sampo's €250,000, followed by UPM at €240,000. The typical large cap chair earns €166,500, so Nordea and Nokia pay their chairs about 2.6 times as much.

Nordea now pays its chair as much as Nokia
Ten highest annual chair fees among Helsinki large caps, 2026 AGMs
Nokia€440,000Nordea€440,000Sampo€250,000UPM€240,000Stora Enso€221,728KONE€220,000Wärtsilä€212,000SSAB*€203,700Telia*€199,500Neste€195,000€0€100k€200k€300k€400k€500k€600k
*Set in SEK, converted at the ECB reference rate on the AGM date (SEK 10.8485 per euro for SSAB on 28 April 2026; SEK 10.8765 for Telia on 9 April 2026) and rounded to the nearest €100.
Source: Listeds board remuneration data, AGM resolution releases 2026

Nordea gave its chair a bigger raise than the rest of its board

The rest of the Nordea board received smaller raises. Ordinary members went up 3.1%, to €115,500, and the vice chair 5.6%, to €190,000. As a result, Nordea's chair now earns 3.8 times what an ordinary board member earns, up from 3.6 times a year ago. No other large cap has a wider gap between its chair and its members.

Nokia pays every board seat at the top of the market

Nokia spreads its money differently. An ordinary member of the Nokia board earns €185,000 a year, more than the chair is paid at 21 of the 32 large caps. Nokia's vice chair earns €210,000, the highest vice chair fee in the segment. Nordea pays most for the chair; Nokia pays the most, or joint most, for every seat.

The top fee has not risen, but two boards now pay it

For nomination boards preparing next year's proposals, the highest chair fee in Helsinki has not moved: Nokia already paid €440,000 in 2025. What has changed is that it is no longer a single outlier. Two of the largest boards in the market now pay the same top fee, and no other board comes close.

Leadership Moves

Oma Savings Bank CEO Karri Alameri steps down weeks after S-Bank takes 96% control

Oma Savings Bank and CEO Karri Alameri have agreed that he will leave the role on 5 November 2026, with his employment ending on 5 May 2027. Alameri will stand for election to the board, which is starting a process to nominate his successor.

Alameri was hired in 2024 to steady the bank after a turbulent year. 

OmaSp’s board appointed Alameri in September 2024, with a start date no later than 1 April 2025, and Sarianna Liiri served as interim CEO until he took over. He joined from the Savings Banks Group, where he had been CEO since 2022, after earlier management roles at OP Financial Group and Danske Bank.

At the time, Alameri said the news flow around OmaSp had been exceptionally challenging in recent months, and that the aim was to “bring the bank back to a good growth and earnings track”.

The exit follows S-Bank’s takeover of the bank

Bloomberg reported in July that S-Bank had agreed to buy OmaSp for EUR 17.20 a share in cash, valuing its equity at about EUR 571 million and representing a premium of about 47% to the previous day’s closing price. According to the report, OmaSp’s board unanimously recommended the offer, and S-Bank said it aims to delist the bank from Nasdaq Helsinki. 

After settling the offer, S-Bank owned 96.40% of OmaSp’s shares and votes on 7 October. OmaSp now describes itself as part of S-Bank Group.

Bloomberg also reported that S-Bank expected the deal to have no immediate material effect on OmaSp’s operations, employees or branch network, but that it intended to change the board after completion and keep the bank as a subsidiary.

S&P raised its long-term rating on the bank to BBB+ from BBB, calling it a highly strategic subsidiary that would benefit from group support if needed.

The January strategy now sits inside a larger group

In January, the board approved a 2026 to 2029 strategy with targets including comparable return on equity above 14%, a cost-to-income ratio below 50% and annual fee and commission income growth above 10%. The cost-to-income ratio stood at 56.1% in 2025. How much of that plan survives integration into S-Bank is now a question for the new owner.

Alameri leaves with guidance cut

Profit has been under pressure throughout his final year. Comparable profit before taxes fell 34% to EUR 56.9 million in 2025 from EUR 86.7 million, as net interest income dropped 20.9%. In the first half of 2026, comparable profit before taxes held at EUR 23.6 million, but net interest income fell a further 20.7%.

In February, OmaSp expected 2026 profit to decline slightly. On 29 September, it said profit will instead fall significantly, citing a shrinking loan portfolio, slower fee income growth, non-performing loans declining more slowly than expected and costs from the tender offer process.

S-Bank will replace most of the board on the day Alameri steps down

OmaSp has called an extraordinary general meeting for 5 November. S-Bank holds about 96.79% of the shares and votes excluding treasury shares, and has decided to redeem the remaining shares under the Finnish Limited Liability Companies Act.

S-Bank proposes cutting the board to five members from the eight elected at the April AGM. The candidates are S-Bank CEO Riikka Laine-Tolonen, Mika Heikkilä, Jussi Sokka, Karri Alameri and current director Irma Gillberg-Hjelt. Gillberg-Hjelt is the only one independent of both the company and its significant shareholders, while Laine-Tolonen, Heikkilä and Sokka are not independent of a significant shareholder. Regulatory approvals are pending for all five.

The meeting is also set to disband the shareholders’ nomination committee and remove it from the articles of association. S-Bank proposes replacing PwC, which the April AGM elected as auditor and sustainability reporting assurer until the 2027 AGM, with KPMG, which already holds both roles at S-Bank. Board members in full-time employment or a similar relationship with an S-Bank Group company would receive no board remuneration or expense reimbursement 

On 5 November, Alameri is set to move from the CEO office to a five-member board on which three directors are not independent of S-Bank. The search for his successor will run under the bank’s new ownership.

Join our Pulse, Best-of-the-Week, and Weekend newsletters

Join our Pulse, Best-of-the-Week, and Weekend newsletters